Payroll employment increases by 214,000 in October; unemployment rate edges down to 5.8%
Last edited Sat Nov 8, 2014, 04:10 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Employment Situation Summary USDL-14-2037
Transmission of material in this release is embargoed until 8:30 a.m. (EST) Friday, November 7, 2014
Technical information:
Household data: (202) 691-6378 * cpsinfo@bls.gov * www.bls.gov/cps
Establishment data: (202) 691-6555 * cesinfo@bls.gov * www.bls.gov/ces
Media contact: (202) 691-5902 * PressOffice@bls.gov
THE EMPLOYMENT SITUATION -- OCTOBER 2014
Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 214,000 in October, and the unemployment
rate edged down to 5.8 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today.
Employment increased in food services and drinking places, retail trade, and
health care.
Household Survey Data
Both the unemployment rate (5.8 percent) and the number of unemployed persons
(9.0 million) edged down in October. Since the beginning of the year, the
unemployment rate and the number of unemployed persons have declined by 0.8
percentage point and 1.2 million, respectively. (See table A-1.)
....
In October, the number of long-term unemployed (those jobless for 27 weeks or
more) was little changed at 2.9 million. These individuals accounted for 32.0
percent of the unemployed. Over the past 12 months, the number of long-term
unemployed has declined by 1.1 million. (See table A-12.)
The civilian labor force participation rate was little changed at 62.8 percent
in October and has been essentially flat since April. The employment-population
ratio increased to 59.2 percent in October. (See table A-1.)
Read more: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
October Jobs Report: Everything You Need to Know
Markets
8:06 am ET
Nov 7, 2014
Yes, its that time again, folks. Jobs Friday, when for one ever-so-brief moment the interests of Wall Street, Washington and Main Street are all aligned on one thing: jobs.
Economists polled by Dow Jones Newswires expect nonfarm payrolls grew by a seasonally adjusted 233,000 in October down from 248,000 jobs added in September with the unemployment rate sticking at 6.1%.
Here at MoneyBeat HQ, well be offering color commentary and tracking the markets before and after the data crosses the wires. Feel free to weigh in yourself, via the comments section. And while youre here, why dont you sign up to follow us on Twitter.
Enjoy the show.
Credit where credit is due:
The MoneyBeat Team:
Stephen Grocer
Editor
Phillipa Leighton-Jones
European Editor
Erik Holm
Deputy Editor
Maureen Farrell
Reporter, New York
Paul Vigna
Reporter, New York
Steven Russolillo
Reporter, New York
David Cottle
Reporter, London
Associated Press
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Good morning, Freepers and DUers alike. I especially welcome our good friends from across the aisle. You're paying for this information too, so you are a welcome participant in this thread. Please, everyone, put aside your differences long enough to digest the information. After that, you can engage in your usual donnybrook.
If you don't have the time to study the report thoroughly, here is the news in a nutshell:
Commissioner's Statement on The Employment Situation
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/jec.nr0.htm
What is important about these statistics is not so much this months number, but the trend. So lets look at some earlier numbers.
ADP® (Automatic Data Processing), for employment in October 2014:
ADP National Employment Report Shows 230,000 Jobs Added in October
Bureau of Labor Statistics, for employment in September 2014:
Payroll employment increases by 248,000 in September; unemployment rate declines to 5.9%
ADP® (Automatic Data Processing), for employment in September 2014:
ADP National Employment Report Shows 213,000 Jobs Added in September
Bureau of Labor Statistics, for employment in August 2014 (hat tip, Garion 55):
Payroll employment increases in August (+142,000); unemployment rate changes little (6.1%)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014888738
ADP® (Automatic Data Processing), for employment in August 2014:
ADP National Employment Report Shows 204,000 Jobs Added in August
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014887794
Bureau of Labor Statistics, for employment in July 2014:
Payroll employment increases in July (+209,000); unemployment rate changes little (6.2%)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014860280
ADP® (Automatic Data Processing), for employment in July 2014:
ADP National Employment Report Shows 218,000 Jobs Added in July
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014858666
Heres a grim thought:
Fed economists: Americas missing workers are not coming back
http://www.democraticunderground.com/111658923
Dissenters, take note:
A New Reason to Question the Official Unemployment Rate
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/26/upshot/a-new-reason-to-question-the-official-unemployment-rate.html
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
A few more things:
Meet FRED, every wonks secret weapon
FRED stands for Federal Reserve Economic Data. It serves as an online clearinghouse for a wealth of numbers: unemployment rates, prices of goods, GDP and CPI, things common and obscure. Today, FRED is more than a little bit famous, thanks to the publics fascination with economic data.
Federal Reserve Economic Data
So how many jobs must be created every month to have an effect on the unemployment rate? There's an app for that.
http://www.frbatlanta.org/chcs/calculator/index.cfm
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Jobs Calculator
And:
Monthly Employment Reports
The large print giveth, and the fine print taketh away.
A DU'er pointed out several months ago that, if I'm going to post the link to the press release, I should include the link to all the tables that provide additional ways of examining the data. Specifically, I should post a link to Table A-15. Alternative measures of labor underutilization. Table A-15 includes those who are not considered unemployed, on the grounds that they have become discouraged about the prospects of finding a job and have given up looking. Here are those links.
Employment Situation
Table A-15. Alternative measures of labor underutilization
From the February 10, 2011, DOL Newsletter:
Take Three
Secretary Solis answers three questions about how the Bureau of Labor Statistics calculates unemployment rates.
How does BLS determine the unemployment rate and the number of jobs that were added each month?
BLS uses two different surveys to get these numbers. The household survey, or Current Population Survey (CPS), involves asking people, from about 60,000 households, a series of questions to assess each person in the household's activities including work and searching for work. Their responses give us the unemployment rate. The establishment survey, or Current Employment Statistics (CES), surveys 140,000 employers about how many people they have on their payrolls. These results determine the number of jobs being added or lost.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)rtracey
(2,062 posts)Democrat failed GOTV policy....Democrat failed candidate policy, Democrat failed leadership policy.....Not Obama failed policy... I know you were sarcastic, but I am not. I am extremely pissed at the fact that 58% of democrat voters did not bother to show up.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)is the adjectival form.
Just sayin'.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)in Arkansas, the Democratic voter participation rate was only 40%.
Apparently, the "battle-ground state" campaigns didn't have access to this report:
http://jointcenter.org/sites/default/files/Joint%20Center%202014%20Black%20Turnout%2010-29-14_0.pdf
Because if he had ... President Obama would have spent more time in Arkansas, than Bill Clinton, and there would have been more President Obama in Colorado, than 6 packs of Coors!
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)mehrrh
(233 posts)Unemployment is down, stock market is up, gas prices are down -- damn that Obama!
Who does he think he is with these steadily improving numbers?
global1
(25,253 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,117 posts)Got a Wapo banner on it too.
Snarkoleptic
(5,997 posts)and they were spinning hard.
"Less than experts predicted" , "signs of a slowing economy", " unemployment) barely ticked down to 5.8%"
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)I know why people lie so brazenly, but I do have trouble figuring out how they get up and do it everyday.
Snarkoleptic
(5,997 posts)ctsnowman
(1,903 posts)Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)SHRED
(28,136 posts)Shemp Howard
(889 posts)If most of the new jobs are well-paying jobs (in manufacturing, etc.), this is good news indeed. But if the new jobs are mainly low-paying service jobs, with no benefits, that's another story.
Ampersand Unicode
(503 posts)I wonder if a lot of these "upticks" in employment have to do with temp hires at Macy's and Sears for the holidays. Usually "unemployment" goes down around the start of the holiday shopping/hiring season and then bumps up in January when the gift-wrappers get canned.
What percentage of these new hires are actually "good" jobs and not just shopping-mall elves or serving up holiday-flavored coffee at "Pumpkin Donuts"? Quality means a lot more than quantity.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)progree
(10,909 posts)Where do you get the information that "unemployment" -- by that I assume you mean the official unemployment numbers --
"goes down around the start of the holiday shopping/hiring season and then bumps up in January when the gift-wrappers get canned."
??? Again -- they are seasonally adjusted numbers that adjust for holiday pickup in employment.
As for wages -- they are higher than under G.W. Bush. Not just the nominal dollar amount, but the inflation-adjusted numbers too.
Production and Non-Supervisory Employees, seasonally adjusted
I favor this measure because it does *not* include supervisors, managers, CEOs, business owners, and so on, whose very high salaries, in some cases, may otherwise distort the overall average skyward. So this production and non-supervisory employees data series is closer to the average working person.
In the below, "real" means inflation-adjusted, so that it indicates its purchasing power. These are seasonally adjusted:
Real Hourly - http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000032
Real Weekly - http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000031
In the below, "nominal" means just the simple ordinary dollar amount, i.e. *not* inflation adjusted. These are seasonally adjusted:
Nominal Hourly - http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000008
Nominal Weekly - http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000030
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)Todays_Illusion
(1,209 posts)OnlinePoker
(5,722 posts)Only 172 thousand of the increase was in manufacturing, but at least everything isn't being made overseas.