Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cal04

(41,505 posts)
Wed Nov 12, 2014, 12:12 AM Nov 2014

U.S. and China reach breakthrough climate deal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions

Source: NBC News

The U.S. and China, which together account for more than a third of all of the world's greenhouse gas emissions, announced a sweeping agreement Wednesday to cut emissions drastically by 2030, a major achievement timed for President Barack Obama's attendance at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in Beijing.

The White House said the U.S. would seek by 2025 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 26 percent to 28 percent below a baseline level from 2005. At the same time, China said it intended to begin reversing the rise of its carbon emissions by 2030 and to increase the non-fossil-fuel share of all if its energy consumption to 20 percent by that year.


Live News conference with President Obama at link
Live Now

Read more: http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/u-s-china-announce-climate-breakthrough-n246636



U.S., China Unveil Ambitious Climate Change Goals

The United States and China unveiled ambitious targets Wednesday to reduce greenhouse gases, aiming to inject fresh momentum into the global fight against climate change ahead of a make-or-break treaty to be finalized next year.

President Barack Obama announced that the U.S. would move much faster in cutting pollution, with a goal to reduce by 26 percent to 28 percent by 2025, compared with 2005 levels. Earlier in his presidency, Obama set a goal to cut emissions by 17 percent by 2020.

Chinese President Xi Jinping, whose country's emissions are still growing as it builds new coal plants, didn't commit to cut emissions by a specific amount. Rather, he set a target for China's emission to peak by 2030, or earlier if possible. He also pledged to increase the share of energy that China will derive from sources other than fossil fuels.

The unexpected breakthrough by the world's two largest polluters reflected both nations' desire to display a united front on climate change, blunting arguments from developing countries that have balked at demands that they get serious about cutting emissions. Yet it was unclear how feasible it would be for either country to meet their goals, and Obama's pledge was sure to confront tough opposition from ascendant Republicans in Congress.



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/11/11/us-china-climate-change_n_6142978.html
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

earthside

(6,960 posts)
2. More grounds for impeachment.
Wed Nov 12, 2014, 12:37 AM
Nov 2014

Senator Imhoffe and Rep. Barton now have all they need, right?

Of course, I'm skeptical that anything will come of this since the Repuglican Senate and House will block anything to mitigate global warming and will do anything to help the fossil fuels industries.

Since much of China's carbon emissions come from manufacturing cheap products for us, we have a double responsibility to work with their government on the climate change crisis.

ffr

(22,670 posts)
3. :D It won't matter to my generation, but those who sat out last Tuesday's
Wed Nov 12, 2014, 12:51 AM
Nov 2014

election are going to feel a slight pinching sensation from where they're sitting.

Nobody to vote for? Nobody appealed to you? Have you not been listening on here? Unfamiliar with bait-n-switch?

You have two years to let it sink in. And while you're at it, read up on who won the American Civil War. You just lost two years of your life and the Republis are going to make it feel more like ten.

ffr

(22,670 posts)
5. Not you Earthside, that was just a side note in the direction you were taking
Wed Nov 12, 2014, 12:54 AM
Nov 2014

Love how you titled that though!

earthside

(6,960 posts)
15. I understand ...
Wed Nov 12, 2014, 10:33 AM
Nov 2014

... thanks.

But the responsibility really does rest upon the Democrats now to get their act together.

Poor turnout is inexcusable, however, the 'leadership' of the Democratic Party made major strategic blunders in this year's campaigns.

Democrats should never again let Repuglicans 'nationalize' a midterm election and not respond in-kind; Democrats essentially ceded the battlefield to the Repuglicans in 2014.

Unfortunately for us, the two years where we do nothing or regress on the climate change issue are years we cannot afford to lose.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
14. "Obama's pledge was sure to confront tough opposition from ascendant Republicans in Congress."
Wed Nov 12, 2014, 06:27 AM
Nov 2014

That is putting it mildly. "More grounds for impeachment" is more accurate.

Cha

(297,300 posts)
4. As John Kerry said in my thread on this, cal..
Wed Nov 12, 2014, 12:53 AM
Nov 2014

"There is no question that all of us will need to do more to push toward the de-carbonization of the global economy. But in climate diplomacy, as in life, you have to start at the beginning, and this breakthrough marks a fresh beginning: Two countries regarded for 20 years as the leaders of opposing camps in climate negotiations – have come together to find common ground, determined to make lasting progress on an unprecedented global challenge. Let’s ensure that this is the first step towards a world that is more prosperous and more secure."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025804460

mahalo, cal

jalan48

(13,870 posts)
18. We'll do it later
Wed Nov 12, 2014, 07:53 PM
Nov 2014

I think the idea is to throw a bone to the progressives and then Obama will sign the Keystone Pipeline agreement. This seems to be how he operates. Say the right things and then do the corporate Democrat thing. The pipeline can happen immediately and then if Republicans make later changes to the emissions agreement, oh well, he can say he tried.

TomCADem

(17,387 posts)
12. Assuming Corporate Media Would Actually Cover It
Wed Nov 12, 2014, 03:47 AM
Nov 2014

Look at the coverage of Obamacare (death panels), the drop in unemployment, President Obama's policies on student loans, etc. Any "good news" would be swept under the rug by a news media that depends on corporate advertising dollars.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. and China reach brea...