Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,727 posts)
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 06:37 PM Nov 2014

Police officials respond to 'rules of engagement' sought for Ferguson protests

Source: St. Louis Post-Dispatch

CLAYTON • State and local officials on Friday announced that while they have not negotiated with a coalition of protest groups, they did agree on some of the 19 proposed "rules of engagement" in advance of the announcement of a grand jury decision in the Ferguson shooting of Michael Brown.

A coalition of roughly 50 groups asked officials earlier this month to agree to 19 rules of engagement for the police response to protests. The first was that “The first priority shall be the preservation of human life.” The groups asked police to agree to a “de-militarized response” that would ban the use of armored vehicles, rubber bullets, rifles and tear gas.

The groups also requested police respect safe spaces set up in houses of worship, and for advance notice of the decision of the grand jury considering whether to charge Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson for the Aug. 9 fatal shooting of Brown, 18.

The unified police command, which includes the Missouri Highway Patrol and St. Louis County and St. Louis city police, said they agree on some of the group's proposed rules, such as the first priority being the preservation of human life. They also agreed to a series of measures intended to facilitate communication, encourage professionalism by police, discourage aggressive acts and allow those not involved in protests to go about their lives.

Read more: http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/police-officials-respond-to-rules-of-engagement-sought-for-ferguson/article_3f747e2c-eca1-529e-ac3c-f2aa4d2df0f8.html



Page 1

Page 2
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Police officials respond to 'rules of engagement' sought for Ferguson protests (Original Post) brooklynite Nov 2014 OP
I thought these cops had cameras. Why isn't wearing the cameras part of the pact? valerief Nov 2014 #1
I think Obama should federalize the National Guard and put them in the streets Horse with no Name Nov 2014 #2
Protesters have to negotiate with police for the right to life. dixiegrrrrl Nov 2014 #3
The police can make any promises they want. Live and Learn Nov 2014 #4
They said subterfuge should not be used to enter safe houses but said safety and "exigent Stryst Nov 2014 #5
Police State cometh blkmusclmachine Nov 2014 #6

Horse with no Name

(33,956 posts)
2. I think Obama should federalize the National Guard and put them in the streets
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 08:02 PM
Nov 2014

to protect the people from the police...not the other way around.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
4. The police can make any promises they want.
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 08:57 PM
Nov 2014

They are not bound to keep them. They lie to people all the time. Why should this be any different?

Stryst

(714 posts)
5. They said subterfuge should not be used to enter safe houses but said safety and "exigent
Sat Nov 22, 2014, 01:38 AM
Nov 2014

circumstances" are valid reasons for police to enter.


So they'll "smell marijuana".

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Police officials respond ...