Judge in George Zimmerman case offers to recuse herself
Source: Yahoo
A Florida judge on Friday offered to recuse herself from the George Zimmerman case in a surprise hearing because of her husband's ties to a CNN legal analyst and commentator.
The Orlando Sentinel reports that Judge Jessica Recksiedler disclosed that her husband works for Mark NeJame, a prominent Orlando attorney, in the five-minute hearing Friday afternoon. In addition to working for his law firm, NeJame sounds off on the Zimmerman case for CNN. It's unclear if either attorney will take Recksiedler up on her offer and ask her to step aside.
NeJame said on CNN today that Recksiedler wants to avoid "the appearance of impropriety" with this disclosure.
Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/judge-george-zimmerman-case-offers-recuse-herself-175152933.html
appleannie1
(5,067 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,737 posts)Trust me. Lawyers who represent clients in this community have not only known to hide their conflicts, but have participated in conspiracies. They fear nothing, since they know that ordinary people have no where to go for recourse.
monmouth
(21,078 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)And she sees nothing but peril to her ambitions if she hears this case. Whatever happens there are going to be a lot of pissed off people and some of their anger will be directed at the judge. Such criticism could make her radioactive if she were ever in line for an appeals court position so I'm sure she would like to toss this hot potato to one of her colleagues.
Baitball Blogger
(46,737 posts)but an outside judge with no political connections to either party would be the best choice.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)SemperEadem
(8,053 posts)and good on her for leading by example. Too few do these days.
marshall gaines
(347 posts)a person in the judicial/police arena with ethics
Broderick
(4,578 posts)take hasty steps to get away from it. It's a no win situation on any front, and I wouldn't want that responsibility. She lucked out being married to NeJame, whose fame really came from the Casey Anthony case.
Justice wanted
(2,657 posts)destroy a judge's career.
The Judge herself did the right thing considering this is going to be EXTREMELY high profile.
BUT we should be concerned about articles using these terms.
On the Road
(20,783 posts)Justice wanted
(2,657 posts)SemperEadem
(8,053 posts)Justice wanted
(2,657 posts)pasto76
(1,589 posts)the simplest answer is most likely the correct one. She is trying maintain her integrity by being upfront. She didnt step aside, but offered to if either prosecution or defense wishes her to. Complete opposite of the Conservative justices in SCOTUS. which is a refreshing change. I dig that.
Amerigo Vespucci
(30,885 posts)Zimmerman Sought Tiger Woodss Lawyer
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2012/04/12/zimmerman-sought-tiger-woodss-lawyer/
Mark NeJame, the Florida attorney well-known for his representation of Tiger Woods, said in an interview on Thursday that he was asked to represent George Zimmerman about a month ago, but he declined to take the case because of time constraints.
On Wednesday, Zimmermans lawyers Craig Sonner and Hal Uhrig announced they were stepping down, saying at a news conference that they havent heard from their client and that has gone out on his own without consulting them.
Afterward, NeJame said, he was again approached by a representative for Zimmerman, who is charged with second-degree murder in the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin. NeJame again declined, but he suggested five lawyers, including OMara, who was hired.
On the top of my list was Mark OMara, who I like as a person, is a friend, and who I respect tremendously, NeJeme said, noting that he had a waiver from Zimmerman to discuss the case.
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)has been charged with, like any other citizen, he is entitled to a fair trail and competent legal representation. If he is convicted I don't want his supporters to be able to suggest that he was railroaded.
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)She establishes impartiality if neither side objects, and gives herself a chance to slip out of the spotlight if either side does object.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)but she may not want to try make the kinds of evidence calls she will have to make.
Anyone else want to voice an opinion on this?
But the prosecutor could easily get someone worse.