Senate GOP Accused Of ‘Closing Off Debate’ During Keystone XL Pipeline Votes
Source: ThinkProgress
Democrats in the Senate are accusing Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of breaking his promise of an open amendment process for legislation to approve construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, after two Democrat-sponsored amendments were not brought to a vote on their merits on Tuesday.
Instead of taking up actual yes or no votes on the amendments, the Senate voted to table meaning, effectively kill those two measures. One, sponsored by Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA), would have required that all the Canadian oil shipped through the Keystone XL pipeline stay in America, and not be shipped overseas. The other, sponsored by Sen. Al Franken (D-MN), would have required that only American-made steel and iron be used to build the pipeline.
The vote to table meant that Senators were not voting on whether they agreed with the content of the amendment, but whether to consider the amendment at all. According to Markey, that doesnt count as an open process.
Senate Republicans promised an open amendment process, but they are closing off debate, and not allowing a vote on the very first amendment considered by the Senate, Markey said in a statement following the vote to kill his amendment, National Journal reported.
Read more: http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2015/01/21/3613404/first-keystone-xl-amendment-votes-senate/
djean111
(14,255 posts)thesquanderer
(11,989 posts)Presidents can change their minds. Vetoes can be over-ridden.
karynnj
(59,503 posts)Last edited Wed Jan 21, 2015, 02:30 PM - Edit history (1)
The Republicans argue that this will provide needed oil for the US and imply that it could change the price of oil. In fact, the real business plan is to have the oil transit through the US, be refined in Texas/LA and then transported to China. Markey's amendment says that the oil can't be exported. If it were added, it would essentially be a poison pill. The Republicans voting against it are then shown as lying on this.
Franken's amendment says that the pipeline must be made with American steel - thus REALLY creating American jobs. All of one Republican, Burr, voted against that. I hope some are called to justify that vote.
Now both Franken and certainly Markey will vote against the final bill - and will almost certainly vote to uphold Obama's veto. When Obama vetoes it -- these votes can be used as further proof that this was political and a give away to an oil company.
Faux news amuses
(1 post)Well put....
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)McConnell is still a Koch whore.
Don't expect him to vere from the orders of his pimps.
corkhead
(6,119 posts)When those wankers were in the minority, the held up everything. Of course it wasn't a "veto" when they did it.
I don't understand why Democrats don't tell McConnell to shove that pipeline up his ass.
karynnj
(59,503 posts)They WILL need 60 votes to pass the bill and they will probably get them. Then Obama will veto -- and they are thought not to have the 67 votes needed to override the veto.
Roland99
(53,342 posts)UP
or DOWN
FailureToCommunicate
(14,014 posts)Voting (or not) has consequences
belzabubba333
(1,237 posts)just veto everything they dont like .
Voting (or not) has consequences
geretogo
(1,281 posts)belzabubba333
(1,237 posts)sammy750
(165 posts)take over private property in the USA. Where is the GOP on this issue. Are they not supporting the people of NE? Anyway, with all the suits, the pipeline is stalled for 2 years now. So no bill passed by the GOP will make OIL flow in the next few years.
lark
(23,102 posts)That's their main gig besides being water carriers for the 1%.