Anti-BDS(boycott, divestment, and sanctions) Bill Would Have Stifled Free Speech On Campus
Op-Eds
Tuesday, September 23, 2014
This week, a student senate committee voted 5-0 to indefinitely table a bill calling on the ASUC and Chancellor Nicholas Dirks to condemn the activism of UC Berkeley faculty and students advocating for boycott, divestment, and sanctions against Israel. BDS is a campaign of international solidarity with members of Palestinian civil society, who in 2005 asked the global community to place economic and institutional pressure on Israel until it respects Palestinians human rights under international law. An essential part of BDS on campus is the academic boycott, which calls on scholars and universities not to cooperate, financially or otherwise, with Israeli institutions that refuse to speak out against their governments policies.
The bill, deceptively titled A Bill in Support of the Free Flow of Ideas and International Academic Collaboration, is nothing of the sort. Rather, it aims to stifle campus Palestine solidarity, explicitly attacking the UC Berkeley professors involved in coordinating an international campus day of action Tuesday. The bill demands that the administration and student leaders erroneously declare the activities of pro-Palestinian organizers to be in violation of academic freedom, while making no mention of Israels routine material violations of Palestinians academic freedom.
This bill tellingly neglects to explain the reason for the academic boycott. Israeli universities are apartheid institutions in an apartheid state: Jewish applicants are three times more likely to be offered admission than Palestinians, only 1 percent of faculty at Israeli universities are Palestinian, and none of Israels eight universities teach in Arabic. Furthermore, like universities in the United States, Israeli institutions actively collaborate with the government in numerous areas such as the development and application of military technologies Israel uses to violate Palestinians most basic rights, including their right to education.
The state that reduced universities and schools to rubble during its massacre in Gaza this summer also massively underfunds schools for its Palestinian citizens. Israels racist transportation checkpoints, which allow Jewish Israelis to pass freely while detaining Palestinians for hours or even days, make freedom of movement impossible for Palestinian scholars and students, who are regularly prevented from attending conferences, accepting offers to study abroad or simply making it to class every day.
In the bill, however, these crucial facts on the ground are nowhere to be found. This privileging of abstract Israeli academic freedom over actual Palestinian lives is disturbing. It also fundamentally misrepresents what the academic boycott is in order to exclude it from the realm of acceptable discourse. The bill claims, for example, that the academic boycott entails stifling partnerships and research with Israeli academics for the sole reason of their national origin.
more...
http://www.dailycal.org/2014/09/23/anti-bds-bill-stifled-free-speech-campus/
Cartoonist
(7,317 posts)the student senate committee, but then I would be called an anti-semite.
Lagom
(26 posts)The conflation of criticism of Israeli policies with anti-Semitism as a tool to silence activism in
support of Palestinian rights is increasingly widespread and widely reported on U.S. college
campuses. At the same time, accusations of support for terrorism are commonly used to malign
activists for Palestinian rights a phenomenon that has gone largely unreported.
In the first four months of 2015, Palestine Solidarity Legal Support (Palestine Legal) responded to
102 requests for legal assistance and reports of incidents on campuses across the country.
In addition to instances of censorship and other forms of suppression of speech activities, these
cases included anti-Arab and anti-Muslim slurs and death threats against activists. Accusations that
students criticizing Israeli policies were anti-Semitic and supported terrorism pervaded the
overwhelming majority of these incidents.
In the four months from January 1 to April 30, 2015, Palestine Legal documented:
60 incidents involving accusations of anti-Semitism made against students or faculty,
based solely on speech critical of Israeli policy.
24 incidents involving accusations of support for terrorism made against students or
faculty, based solely on speech critical of Israeli policy
more
http://jewishvoiceforpeace.org/blog/criticism-of-israel-is-not-anti-semitism
http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/nora-barrows-friedman/false-claims-anti-semitism-climb-us-campuses-new-report