Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

antigop

(12,778 posts)
Wed Feb 4, 2015, 12:12 PM Feb 2015

Wendell Potter: Millions of Middle Class Americans Will Remain Uninsured Despite Obamacare

http://wendellpotter.com/2015/02/millions-of-middle-class-americans-will-remain-uninsured-despite-obamacare/

No-man’s land captures those too rich for subsidies but too poor for sanctions.

The good news from last week’s Congressional Budget Office report was that Obamacare will cost 20 percent less through 2019 than originally expected. That’s in part because medical inflation has slowed more than the CBO anticipated back in 2010 when the law went into effect.

But the report had bad news too. Fewer people are signing up for coverage than the government had hoped. In fact, the CBO estimates that 31 million of us will still be uninsured 10 years from now.

The Supreme Court bears some of the responsibility on that front. It ruled in 2012 that even though Congress intended for all the states to expand their Medicaid programs to include more low-income individuals and families, states could opt out of that requirement. And many with Republican governors and legislatures did. .

The other main reason for the sobering estimate of uninsured 10 years down the road: many people still can’t afford to buy health insurance, even with financial help from the government.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wendell Potter: Millions of Middle Class Americans Will Remain Uninsured Despite Obamacare (Original Post) antigop Feb 2015 OP
IIRC, someone said that a strong public option was the only way to control health insurance costs. merrily Feb 2015 #1
Even fewer can afford to use it zipplewrath Feb 2015 #2
See this article antigop Feb 2015 #3
No relationship to the ACA zipplewrath Feb 2015 #4
Those of us in favor of single-payer knew this was going to happen. n/t area51 Feb 2015 #5

merrily

(45,251 posts)
1. IIRC, someone said that a strong public option was the only way to control health insurance costs.
Wed Feb 4, 2015, 12:16 PM
Feb 2015

That was not entirely true, of course. There was also single payer. Single payer or strong public option were the ways to control insurance costs.

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
2. Even fewer can afford to use it
Wed Feb 4, 2015, 01:16 PM
Feb 2015

People are buying the government supported health insurance and not being able to afford to use it.

We don't see statistics on this, at least not yet, but the underlying cost of the care is not cheap, especially on the "bronze" plans. I just had a test procedure that cost $2700 out of pocket, and that was on a "gold" plan. Most folks I know could not afford that, especially as part of the larger costs of the treatment it was testing about. I do wonder how many people STILL aren't getting health CARE because they can't afford it, even with mandated health INSURANCE.

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
4. No relationship to the ACA
Wed Feb 4, 2015, 02:26 PM
Feb 2015

I get the point of the article, but there is no relationship to the ACA. This was a trend that already existed. I'm dubious that the ACA accelerated it. Mostly it just ignored it. The ACA forced a lot of people into the system who will fall into this category. But there is no hard data on how many people have been forced into health insurance that they cannot afford to use. By the way, the insurance companies love these people. They are fiscally equivalent to insuring the healthy. All premiums, no payments.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Wendell Potter: Millions ...