Sea-Change in Venezuela

[Judi Lynn]

March 11, 2015

What to Make of the White House's Recent Declarations?

Sea-Change in Venezuela

by CHRIS GILBERT


Caracas.

When President Maduro responded to the recent White House executive order declaring Venezuela to be a national security threat, saying first that it was a “Frankenstein” and later that it was “schizophrenic,” he may have made small errors regarding both literature and psychiatry, but his point was clear enough: Obama’s decree is a bit like Frankenstein’s monster (a hodgepodge) and it indeed comes from a government with a split-personality.

In fact, U.S. politics, like that of most Northern governments, is deeply irrational. This is in part because it is concerted among various oligarchical interests and monopoly groups, making the official discourse really something of an epiphenomenon. Yet it is also because the political sphere obeys discordant, heterogeneous time-frames.

U.S. politics’ profound internal clock – which ticks away in the country’s innards – is that of capital accumulation. The demands of capital accumulation, when they irrupt on the surface of usual national and international politics (with its quotidian fare of summits, elections, and everyday lawmaking) produce strange effects that defy the rationality of this more visible arena.

Take the case of the U.S.’s policies regarding Venezuela. This country’s recent political panorama has been defined, in the first place, by a Bolivarian reformist government that has opted for a Chinese-style project of gradually diversifying its productive apparatus and, in the second place, by a right-wing opposition that (because it was tacitly consulted on the government’s reforms) was inclined to wait patiently for upcoming elections, in which it projected important successes.

Abruptly, this has all undergone a sea-change. In months, if not weeks, the older scenario has given way to a situation marked by widespread political disobedience on the part of the opposition, a graver economic situation, alarming information about coups d’etat, and now open U.S. interference.

More:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/03/11/sea-change-in-venezuela/

[fasttense]

1. The uber rich.don't like too much socialism in South

America. When the capitalist in control of the US feared socialism in Venezuela was getting too uppity, they made Obama issue that flagrant promise of US interference.

Time for a capitalist funded Chilean style coupe.

[cheapdate]

2. The premise that the drop in oil prices was "engineered"

and happened "as if from nowhere" is popular in Venezuela. It's also very farfetched.

There is a glut of oil supply for reasons which are quite knowable and which don't require intriguing explanations.

There are some good insights in the story, but the "engineered" oil prices aren't one of them.