Man Has Patent Which Could Destroy Monsanto
http://yournewswire.com/man-has-patent-which-could-destroy-monsanto/Paul Stamets was granted a patent in 2006 to naturally prevent insects from destroying crops.
It is being described as SMART pesticides and has Monsanto extremely worried.
Loveclicks.org reports:
Yet with Monsanto generating nearly $16 BILLION dollars in 2014, they certainly do not want anything getting in the way of that money flow. That kind of revenue gives them a lot of resources and abilities to suppress information that may be damaging to them.
Like this patent of Paul Stamets. Paul has figured out how to use mother natures own creations to keep insects from destroying crops. It is whats being called SMART pesticides. These biopesticides provide a safe & nearly permanent solution for controlling over 200,000 species of insects, and it is all thanks to the magic of mushrooms.
I wont go into the specifics of how it all works, for most of us wont really understand it anyway, but to summarize, he does this by taking entomopathogenic Fungi (fungi that destroys insects) and morphs it into not producing spores. This in turn actually attracts the insects who then eat and turn into fungi from the inside out!
For those who do want to do their own further research on the topic, I have provided a list of links below to help you along.
As more people wake up to the damaging effects of Monsantos chemicals & GMO foods, the demand for truly nutritious, pesticide free, non-gmo, organic foods is on the rise. We are seeing more community gardens & urban forests being created. More people are starting to grow food, not lawns. Permaculture is becoming more widely talked about and understood. There is a major paradigm shift happening right now as our collective consciousness expands and awakens.
These truly are exciting, monumental times we live in. We are seeing old world ways crumble and power structures fall as we wake up and step up to collectively create a more healthy and sustainable way of working, living & playing together on this planet. The time has come. We can do this!
Here is a link to the patent we are speaking of: http://www.google.com/patents/US7122176
- See more at: http://yournewswire.com/man-has-patent-which-could-destroy-monsanto/#sthash.hNKVuKK4.dpuf
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Does he end up selling the patent to anyone, such as, say.... Monsanto?
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)He should stay off small planes and beware black suburbans, that's for sure.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)HIM, won't solve the problem.
TBF
(32,084 posts)NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)malokvale77
(4,879 posts)Every year I expand a bit more of my yard to grow food. Nothing angers me more than for my neighbor to pour Roundup and toxic pesticides along our common fence line.
Two years ago that shit washed into my garden after a rainstorm and killed all my newly sprouted crops.
Warpy
(111,317 posts)The west is in a severe drought that some climatologists are starting to call "unprecedented." That means expensive potable water and that means we get our produce from Mexico or that small strip along the Rio Grande that has deeded irrigation rights.
You have my sympathy, it's always something: Roundup, Chem Lawn, or woodchucks, rabbits and deer.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)I moved into the city from the country and too many people where I am now have TruGreen spray poison. Wish I could make them stop.
I love where I am, and it's the best place for me now, but I miss the lightning bugs and the butterflies and all the other critters.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)I have a standard 1/4 acre suburban lot. I am really getting sick of people pouring Roundup all over because they saw a dandelion. Hell, I make wine from that.
I have never put any pesticide on my property. My dog is the only one in the neighborhood with no fleas.
I compost FFS.
I feel like going ninja on these assholes. LOL
Brainstormy
(2,381 posts)do the chemical lawn thing. The lawns aren't House and Garden, but they're pretty good. Neither of my two dogs have ever had fleas. We save a LOT of money, too.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)but what is FFS?
Hestia
(3,818 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)to seriously hurt or cripple Monsanto.
And I'd raise a toast to him if he did.
AwakeAtLast
(14,132 posts)mopinko
(70,178 posts)fungi to get the nutrients from the soil to the plant.
i bought some. i will let you know how it works.
he is a very smart cookie. fungi are where it is at. they are the root of my soil building.
when we plow fields, we disrupt them terribly. that's why we are pretty much no till. course, you cant till a hugelbed, even it you want to. at least not for the first decade or so.
alfredo
(60,075 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Alittleliberal
(528 posts)alfredo
(60,075 posts)EvolveOrConvolve
(6,452 posts)He's essentially genetically modifying fungus to create "non-GMO" food. Should be amusing to watch.
pnwmom
(108,990 posts)This isn't the same as artificially introducing DNA into a species.
EvolveOrConvolve
(6,452 posts)do what he's claiming it does. The story doesn't describe the mechanism by which he modifies the organism, but I'd be willing to bet it has something to do with modifying its DNA.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)EvolveOrConvolve
(6,452 posts)But I'm not sure if it's the same process for a fungus since the way fungi reproduce is different from the mechanism used by plants to reproduce.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)They are BRED to be that way. You know - how we used to do it before microguns shooting DNA about were invented.
Do your homework before you wind us sounding even MORE foolish.
Though the GMO people would like you to believe otherwise,
natural selection is NOTHING like Gene Splicing.
You will hear that LIE repeated over and over, even here at DU.
BTW: Monsanto got their GMO products approved...NOT by scientists,
but by politicians in Washington whose verdict was that GMO was "close enough" that it didn't need to be tested.... Politicians, NOT scientists.
To Date: There has been NO long term testing of GMO crops.
pnwmom
(108,990 posts)Certified organic foods cannot contain GMOs, by law. Paul Stamet sells organic mushrooms.
http://www.fungi.com
This is Paul Stametss company. Fungi Perfecti is Certified Organic by the Washington State Department of Agriculture.
http://us2.campaign-archive2.com/?u=15e749d2cd641286217a55794&id=9c1bbc8350
For years, Paul Stamets and the Fungi Perfecti team have worked to locate and study specimens of Agarikon (Fomitopsis officinalis). This stately polypore mushroom is unique in its longevity: some specimens are thought to survive for as long as 75 years, withstanding pathogens, parasites and the elements. Due to its powerful potential to support human and ecosystem health, our team works to preserve as many Agarikon strains as possible. Once preserved, each strain can then be evaluated for efficacy, then sustainably cultivated to produce functional food supplements for humans or spawn to help restore this species in threatened environments. During NAMA, we located not one but two Agarikon specimens!
EvolveOrConvolve
(6,452 posts)But I'm not sure if that certification extends to his pesticide products (or if it's even applicable to this type of pesticide).
I'm not a mycologist, but reading through his patent application shows that he's doing some kind of genetic modification:
If he's not doing any sort of genetic modification, then his patent application is essentially for the growth of a natural substance, which shouldn't be a patentable process.
pnwmom
(108,990 posts)And what he's patenting is the technology for working with the fungi not the fungi DNA itself.
https://www.google.com/patents/US20040161440?dq=paul+stamets&hl=en&sa=X&ei=8dLrVL2XLcOeggTOsISIDQ&ved=0CE4Q6AEwBw
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0015] The present invention offers an environmentally benign approach to insect control by attracting the insects who ingest latent preconidial mycelium (which may be fresh, dried or freeze-dried) which then infects the host. The preconidial mycelium is both the attractant and the pathogenic agent. The infected insects carrying the fungal hyphae become a vector back to the central colony, further dispersing the fungal pathogen. Mycelium is grown in pure culture using standard fermentation techniques for in vitro propagation. The fermented mycelia is diluted and transferred into a sterilized grain or a mixture of sterilized grains. Once inoculated, the fermented mycelia matures to a state prior to conidia formation. The preconidial mycelium may be utilized as is or may be arrested in its development through flash chilling (or by other means such as air-drying or refrigeration) and packaged in spoilage-proof or sealed packages. The end-user facilitates opening the package and placing the exposed mycelia-grain contents in the vicinity of recent pest activity.
[0016] The present invention thus provides improved products and methods wherein the fungal mycelium acts as bait and attractant and as an ingested or food insecticide, palatable enough that insects will readily consume it even in the presence of competing food sources, with high recruitment of other insects among social insects that exhibit such behavior. This results in multiple visits to a highly attractive pathogenic bait, thereby providing effective individual insect and/or colony inoculation.
[0017] The present invention further provides these and other advantages with improved control of insect pests using fungal insecticidal compositions (mycopesticides) having strong attractant properties and placing these attractant mycopesticides in or around an object or area to be protected. The present invention also provides insecticidal baits which use, as a toxicant, relatively innocuous, naturally occurring materials as the active agent, so as to control insects without undue effect on the ecology. Finally, by actively avoiding the use of conidia, the time and expense of raising conidial stage mycelium and/or separating conidia is avoided.
[0018] Still further objects and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description and appended claims.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)He didn't create it using laboratory equipment costing millions of dollars.
Hybrids are patentable. Just ask Burpee.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)Utilizing "modern genetic engineering" to do this.
He simply knows how to select for for this aspect, and the mushrooms do the rest.
I have never heard of Stamets refering to dealing with any type of GM facility, and doubt that he would need to.
mopinko
(70,178 posts)this is just a collection of spores.
i presume he was given a patent for the combination because he has proven that it serves the function of controlling weeds. i know it was a long slog.
his fertilizing blends are not patented, so i assume it is the function rather than the composition that got him the patent.
sorry, nice try, tho.
Thespian2
(2,741 posts)Our province bans Round-up, except in a highly diluted form. I grow my garden without pesticides of any kind. I don't mind feeding the insects if they share with me, and they usually do. Best to grow your own food, but I know in America, in many communities, vegetable growing is outlawed.
mountain grammy
(26,642 posts)worked great. Not too many insects up here, crops either. Definitely seeing fewer bees.
ProudMomof3Cuties
(3 posts)Much as the industry is doing to attack and conceal the FUNGUS THAT CAN DESTROY BEDBUGS!!!!
Beauveria bassiana
It's avaialable in a product called BOTANIGUARD, designed for aphids.
IMAGINE THE CRIMINALITY OF SUPRESSING THIS. Bedbugs are a constant companion( immune system destroyer) of the worlds poor populations.
It would only take a small amount of money for governments to dispense this to the masses.
Alas.........Libor rigging, buying mansions and destroying Libyan water pipes to sell more IMF loans are they're cup of tea.
stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)Always glad to see someone who's aware that the IMF's agenda is far from altruistic.
Response to ProudMomof3Cuties (Reply #14)
stillwaiting This message was self-deleted by its author.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)people throw words around that they don't understand.
Bedbugs suck blood. PERIOD.
arikara
(5,562 posts)He's written several books about mushrooms and fungi, Mycellium Running is his classic, written 10 years ago. He talks about the uses of mushrooms beyond culinary, and how they can actually be used to detoxify the environment among other things.
He's the visionary expert of the mushroom world. I can't see him selling out.
http://www.amazon.ca/Mycelium-Running-Mushrooms-Help-World/dp/1580085792/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1426394041&sr=8-2&keywords=paul+stamets
C Moon
(12,219 posts)But I wouldn't put it past Monsanto and ilk to come up with something to kill Stamets fungi.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)jmowreader
(50,562 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)jmowreader
(50,562 posts)The thing Monsanto is best at making is money.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)...is how and why they kill.
- It's hard to break old habits when you've been a killer for so long......
[center]America's premier POISON MAKERS.
Towns poisoned by Monsanto[/center]
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)K&R!
Hemp plants for remediation of highly contaminated soils
sorechasm
(631 posts)...that could spore within a Monsanto factory and eat it up from the inside. Would that be patentable?
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)magical thyme
(14,881 posts)Statements like this concern me. I don't know if they are just writing shorthand hyperbole for a process they can't describe of it they mean that the insect literally turns into fungus (or is overrun by fungus).
Because if it is the latter, I wonder what the effect is on birds or frogs that eat the insect-fungus. Does their digestive system break down the fungus, or are they, too, killed by it?
Obviously, I need to read further on this to answer my question, but the bottom line for me is "what, if any, are the unintended consequences?" If only because so many "easy solutions" to problems turn out to create 10 more problems in their wake...
JoeyT
(6,785 posts)I'm guessing he's just making them bypass insect defense mechanisms or spread more rapidly somehow.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entomopathogenic_fungus
DhhD
(4,695 posts)There is a gametophyte generation and a sporophyte generation.
The patent describes a process known to the holder to keep the fungi in one of the generations longer depending on the compounds present, between the host and fungi, so the absorption is great enough to kill the insect. The patent reads about the presence of several fungi and the patent holders who know the chemical processes of absorption to the death of the certain insect by way of their patented process. In other words, these many processes were well known and patented, long before Monsanto came on the scene.
The chemical compounds that make up the insects body are absorbed and reconstructed by the DNA of the Fungi Kingdom. Same in the Animal Kingdom. Animals eat, absorb the food, and build new cells. It is just a part of the living biosphere we call Earth.
jmowreader
(50,562 posts)Interesting:
http://www.waldeneffect.org/blog/King_Stropharia_mushrooms_in_permaculture/
Turns out honeybees will eat at least one specie of mushroom...so I gotta know: if it turns out honeybees have a taste for the bug-eating mushrooms, have we gained anything?
sue4e3
(731 posts)I was getting ready to say now we'll have bees that are fungi instead of just dead that's so much better
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)There are a number of issues with them such as...
Short shelf life
expensive to produce
Zero preventative effect (the bugs have to already be there for the product to be effective)
Time to kill can be problematic (the bugs do significant damage before they die)
Specific meteorological conditions are required (narrow range of temperature and/or humidity)
One other issue with this particular one seems to be that if it controls "over 200,000 species of insects", it's a pretty safe bet that many of those are bugs you don't want to kill.
I don't think Monsanto is going to be too worried about this.
paleotn
(17,938 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)Overseas
(12,121 posts)obxhead
(8,434 posts)I love misleading headlines.
Insecticides are just one of the three major pesticide groups used on crops. A mushroom will not eliminate the use of herbicides or fungicides.
Is this potentially good news that could reduce our use of insecticides? Maybe, hopefully. However it will absolutely NOT destroy Monsanto or eliminate GMO crops.
paleotn
(17,938 posts)..this method has significant drawbacks and is not useful at all in many situations. Thus, it WILL NOT do any damage to Monsanto.
do you want to be specific, or is this just a blanket bullshit response?
Response to Demeter (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed