Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 04:03 AM Apr 2015

Deep Support in Washington for C.I.A.’s Drone Missions

WASHINGTON — About once a month, staff members of the congressional intelligence committees drive across the Potomac River to C.I.A. headquarters in Langley, Va., and watch videos of people being blown up.

As part of the macabre ritual the staff members look at the footage of drone strikes in Pakistan and other countries and a sampling of the intelligence buttressing each strike, but not the internal C.I.A. cables discussing the attacks and their aftermath. The screenings have provided a veneer of congressional oversight and have led lawmakers to claim that the targeted killing program is subject to rigorous review, to defend it vigorously in public and to authorize its sizable budget each year.

That unwavering support from Capitol Hill is but one reason the C.I.A.’s killing missions are embedded in American warfare and unlikely to change significantly despite President Obama’s announcement on Thursday that a drone strike accidentally killed two innocent hostages, an American and an Italian. The program is under fire like never before, but the White House continues to champion it, and C.I.A. officers who built the program more than a decade ago — some of whom also led the C.I.A. detention program that used torture in secret prisons — have ascended to the agency’s powerful senior ranks.

Although lawmakers insist that there is great accountability to the program, interviews with administration and congressional officials show that Congress holds the program to less careful scrutiny than many members assert. Top C.I.A. officials, who learned the importance of cultivating Congress after the resistance they ran into on the detention program, have dug in to protect the agency’s drone operations, frustrating a pledge by Mr. Obama two years ago to overhaul the program and pull it from the shadows.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/26/us/politics/deep-support-in-washington-for-cias-drone-missions.html?referrer=&_r=0

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Deep Support in Washington for C.I.A.’s Drone Missions (Original Post) jakeXT Apr 2015 OP
The US has become a failed backwater republic IDemo Apr 2015 #1
Pathetic losers clinging to their careers, all the while pretending to be Masters of the Universe, bemildred Apr 2015 #2
http://image.slidesharecdn.com/fascism-119343334774076-2/95/fascism-50-728.jpg blkmusclmachine Apr 2015 #3
Shades of Joseph McCarthy! Rebuke them! Demeter Apr 2015 #4

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
1. The US has become a failed backwater republic
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 09:19 AM
Apr 2015

Deeply corrupt, militaristic (as always), distrustful of its citizens. But let's all continue to pretend that our electoral politics will yield a bright future for the children.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
2. Pathetic losers clinging to their careers, all the while pretending to be Masters of the Universe,
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 10:09 AM
Apr 2015

and Leaders of the Free World, for us chumps out here in TV Land, and grovelling over videos of the blowing up of a few more peasants in the 2nd and 3rd world. Pathetic.

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
4. Shades of Joseph McCarthy! Rebuke them!
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 09:02 PM
Apr 2015
On June 9, 1954, the 30th day of the Army–McCarthy hearings, McCarthy accused Fred Fisher, one of the junior attorneys at Welch's law firm, of associating while in law school with the National Lawyers Guild (NLG), a group that J. Edgar Hoover sought to have the U.S. attorney general designate as a Communist front organization. Welch had privately discussed the matter with Fisher and the two agreed Fisher should withdraw from the hearings. Welch dismissed Fisher's association with the NLG as a youthful indiscretion and attacked McCarthy for naming the young man before a nationwide television audience without prior warning or previous agreement to do so:

Until this moment, Senator, I think I have never really gauged your cruelty or your recklessness. Fred Fisher is a young man who went to the Harvard Law School and came into my firm and is starting what looks to be a brilliant career with us. Little did I dream you could be so reckless and so cruel as to do an injury to that lad. It is true he is still with Hale and Dorr. It is true that he will continue to be with Hale and Dorr. It is, I regret to say, equally true that I fear he shall always bear a scar needlessly inflicted by you. If it were in my power to forgive you for your reckless cruelty I would do so. I like to think I am a gentle man, but your forgiveness will have to come from someone other than me.


When McCarthy tried to renew his attack, Welch interrupted him:

Senator, may we not drop this? We know he belonged to the Lawyers Guild. Let us not assassinate this lad further, Senator. You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir? At long last, have you left no sense of decency?


McCarthy tried to ask Welch another question about Fisher, and Welch interrupted:

Mr. McCarthy, I will not discuss this further with you. You have sat within six feet of me and could have asked me about Fred Fisher. You have seen fit to bring it out. And if there is a God in Heaven it will do neither you nor your cause any good. I will not discuss it further. I will not ask Mr. Cohn any more questions. You, Mr. Chairman, may, if you will, call the next witness.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_N._Welch



I can't believe they got it on film!
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Deep Support in Washingto...