Israel vs. Iran: The Truth Slips Out

[marmar]

Published on Thursday, February 9, 2012 by [font color="blue"]Common Dreams[/font]
Israel vs. Iran: The Truth Slips Out

by Ira Chernus


Just days after the New York Times Magazine’s lurid cover story, “Israel Vs. Iran,” the Washington Post struck back with a two-fisted effort to win the “most dire prediction” contest. The Post’s foreign policy pundit David Ignatius wrote a widely-circulated column claiming inside information: U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta “believes there is a strong likelihood that Israel will strike Iran in April, May or June.” The next day the Post’s front page headline warned ominously, “Israel: Iran Must Be Stopped Soon.”

Both stories reported that the Obama administration opposes any Israeli action, just like the Bush administration before it. The risks to U.S. interests are incalculable, as the Pentagon and State Department have been telling us for years.

Yet both stories added a new note: Israel might strike without U.S. support or permission. “The administration appears to favor staying out of the conflict unless Iran hits U.S. assets,” Ignatius wrote.

Of course the U.S. is already in the conflict, as the Iranians know perfectly well. Israel’s ability to strike depends largely on its high-tech weaponry, paid for by the $3 billion a year coming from Washington. With that kind of money flowing -- plus U.S. diplomatic support, which many in Israel see as their last barrier against international isolation -- the Obama administration has powerful leverage to stop any Israeli action that threatens U.S. interests. ................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/02/09-1

[xchrom]

1. du rec. nt

[tabatha]

2. Obama recently stated that Israel will not strike Iran.

It was on DU.

[thelordofhell]

3. Who are you going to believe...The Pres or the Press

After all, The President is only ending Middle East conflicts that the press was 100% complicit in starting.