Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Panich52

(5,829 posts)
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 12:38 PM Nov 2015

After Paris, Republicans renew bitter fight over semantics

Maddow Blog

After Paris, Republicans renew bitter fight over semantics

By Steve Benen
During Saturday night’s debate for the Democratic presidential candidates, CBS News’ John Dickerson posed the one question Republicans often consider the single most important aspect of U.S. national security.

“Secretary Clinton, you mentioned ‘radical jihadists,’” the moderator noted. “Marco Rubio, also running for president, said that this attack showed and the attack in Paris showed that we are at war with ‘radical Islam.’ Do you agree with that characterization, ‘radical Islam’?”

Clinton explained that we’re “at war with violent extremism,” not a major world religion. When Dickerson posed the question to Clinton rivals, Bernie Sanders explained, “I don’t think the term is what’s important.”

For Republicans, however, the issue of word choice is extraordinarily important. During the debate and on each of the Sunday shows, conservatives were practically hysterical in their preoccupation with semantics.

More
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/after-paris-republicans-renew-bitter-fight-over-semantics?cid=eml_mra_20151116

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»After Paris, Republicans ...