Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(113,413 posts)
Thu Dec 10, 2015, 11:33 PM Dec 2015

Time’s “Person of the Year” Is a Woman for the First Time in 29 Years

Time’s “Person of the Year” Is a Woman for the First Time in 29 Years


Today, German Chancellor Angela Merkel was named Time’s 2015 Person of the Year for her leadership on the Syrian refugee and Greek debt crises. Merkel becomes just the fourth woman to win the honor—outside of a group of winners—since it was first presented in 1927. She is also the first individual woman to win since 1986, and the first individual woman to receive the award since Time changed its title from “Man of the Year” in 1999.



In announcing the magazine’s decision, Time managing editor Nancy Gibbs said, “For asking more of her country than most politicians would dare, for standing firm against tyranny as well as expedience and for providing steadfast moral leadership in a world where it is in short supply, Angela Merkel is ‘Time’s Person of the Year.’”

Earlier this year, Merkel helped shape Europe’s response to Greece’s continuing debt crisis, insisting on strict austerity measures before any bailouts went ahead.

With the Syrian conflict forcing millions of refugees away from home, Merkel opened Germany’s doors, committing to accept 800,000 asylum seekers this year. It is expected that the number will approach 1 million by year’s end.

“She has stepped up in a way that was uncharacteristic even for her,” Gibbs continued. “She’s been a very long-serving leader, the longest-serving in the west. She controls the world’s fourth largest economy, but this year she really was tested in how she would respond to some of the most difficult challenges that any leader is facing in the world.”

. . . .

http://msmagazine.com/blog/2015/12/09/times-person-of-the-year-is-a-woman-for-the-first-time-in-29-years/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

MADem

(135,425 posts)
1. Can't believe they only changed it from MAN of the Year 16 years ago.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:36 AM
Dec 2015

And can't believe they've only given it to four individual women....one of whom was famous for screwing a former King!!!


The cover of TIME’s year-end issue of 1986 shows a confident woman in a red jacket, her gaze steady, her chin resting on her hand. It is Corazon Aquino, the first woman President of the Philippines, a political outsider who upended a dictator by, as Pico Iyer wrote in his cover story, “leading a democratic revolution that captured the world’s imagination.” If you look up the table of contents of that issue in the Time archive, you’ll find a line that reads “Woman of the Year.” Immediately following is a parenthetical: (Man of the Year).

“Woman of the Year (Man of the Year)” — that’s how they did it back then. Like Wallis Simpson and Queen Elizabeth before her, Corazon Aquino was a woman in a man’s franchise. In 1999, TIME changed the title to Person of the Year. But not since President Aquino has the Person of the Year been an individual woman. Not, at least, until 2015.

Why the long wait? As I wrote a few years ago, the label of Person of the Year tends to favor people with institutional power. The choice reflects TIME’s view of who affected the news and our lives, for good or for ill. Since 1986 there’ve been four U.S. Presidents in the mix — three of them two-termers, all of them men. Plus a handful of leaders of the Soviet Union (and Russia), also all men. The Pope keeps being a man. And it’s a lot easier to make news from an address like the White House, the Kremlin or the Vatican....


http://time.com/4141766/time-person-of-the-year-angela-merkel-women/?xid=tcoshare


?quality=75&strip=color&w=395

?quality=75&strip=color&w=408

?quality=75&strip=color&w=421

?quality=75&strip=color&w=419

niyad

(113,413 posts)
2. sadly, that Time still remains the patriarchal bastion that it is surprises me not in the least.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 01:09 PM
Dec 2015

thank you so much for finding those covers for us, I do appreciate it.
"man and wife" is a phrase that has always annoyed me. a real person, vs a role. grrrrr.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
3. Woman and husband!
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 04:45 PM
Dec 2015

I am no particular fan of Margaret Thatcher's career, but I can remember the derisive mocking her husband got on a daily basis, pretty much. He was portrayed as a milquetoast and she was a ball-breaker. Only the LADS are allowed to be decisive and independent; when the women try doing the same thing, they are stripped of their femininity and described as mannish, brutish, frigid, hard, etc. And a man, married to such a woman, why, he has to be some sort of "sissy" to "put up" with that sort of arrangement! It's terribly obvious. Tiresome, too. It's the default way to describe any woman in public life who has the nerve to speak up.

I sit here in the middle of the second decade of the 21st Century and wonder how long it will take the world to "get it." I think I'd need to live another hundred years to see something even starting to be perceived as true gender equality.

niyad

(113,413 posts)
4. your title was correct. it is an interesting experiment to use that and listen to the howling, and
Sat Dec 12, 2015, 01:09 PM
Dec 2015

then point out the "man and wife" thing.

We seem to be devolving at such a rate that you and I are going to have to stick around for several centuries to see true gender equality.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Time’s “Person of the Yea...