Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Doctors barred from discussing glitches in U.S.-funded software
Right, this is old stuff. I'm clearing out inboxes at the end of the year.
Doctors barred from discussing glitches in U.S.-funded software
By Darius Tahir | 09/11/15 11:54 AM EDT
President Barack Obamas stimulus put taxpayers on the hook for $30 billion in electronic medical records, many of which have turned out to be technological disasters.
But dont expect to hear about the problems from doctors or hospitals. Most of them are under gag orders not to discuss the specific failings of their systems even though poor technology in hospitals can have lethal consequences.
A POLITICO investigation found that some of the biggest firms marketing electronic record systems inserted gag clauses in their taxpayer-subsidized contracts, effectively forbidding health care providers from talking about glitches that slow their work and potentially jeopardize patients.
POLITICO obtained 11 contracts through public record requests from hospitals and health systems in New York City, California, and Florida that use six of the biggest vendors of digital record systems. With one exception, each of the contracts contains a clause protecting potentially large swaths of information from public exposure. This is the first time the existence of the gag clauses has been conclusively documented.
By Darius Tahir | 09/11/15 11:54 AM EDT
President Barack Obamas stimulus put taxpayers on the hook for $30 billion in electronic medical records, many of which have turned out to be technological disasters.
But dont expect to hear about the problems from doctors or hospitals. Most of them are under gag orders not to discuss the specific failings of their systems even though poor technology in hospitals can have lethal consequences.
A POLITICO investigation found that some of the biggest firms marketing electronic record systems inserted gag clauses in their taxpayer-subsidized contracts, effectively forbidding health care providers from talking about glitches that slow their work and potentially jeopardize patients.
POLITICO obtained 11 contracts through public record requests from hospitals and health systems in New York City, California, and Florida that use six of the biggest vendors of digital record systems. With one exception, each of the contracts contains a clause protecting potentially large swaths of information from public exposure. This is the first time the existence of the gag clauses has been conclusively documented.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1238 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (19)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Doctors barred from discussing glitches in U.S.-funded software (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Dec 2015
OP
Scuba
(53,475 posts)1. Having spent three decades dealing with the software vendors in question, I can assure you...
... that they'll use any and every dirty trick they can to hide their problems, bilk their customers and increase their profits.
Old Codger
(4,205 posts)2. Everyone Thinks
Dilbert is a comic
bananas
(27,509 posts)3. Didn't hear about it, thanks for posting. nt
bemildred
(90,061 posts)4. Really gives one confidence in the health care system.
You would not think it was all that tricky. A sort of medical wikipedia, but private, only for medical providers to use.