Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 04:27 PM Feb 2016

The Fed Wants to Test How Banks Would Handle Negative Rates

As interest rates turn negative around the world, the Federal Reserve is asking banks to consider the possibility of the same happening in the U.S.

In its annual stress test for 2016, the Fed said it will assess the resilience of big banks to a number of possible situations, including one where the rate on the three-month U.S. Treasury bill stays below zero for a prolonged period.

"The severely adverse scenario is characterized by a severe global recession, accompanied by a period of heightened corporate financial stress and negative yields for short-term U.S. Treasury securities," the central bank said in announcing the stress tests last week.

In that particular simulation, the unemployment rate doubles to 10 percent, the same level it reached in the aftermath of the last financial crisis.

Three-month bill rates have slipped slightly below zero several times in recent years, including in September after the Fed delayed rate liftoff amid global financial market turmoil, touching a low of minus 0.05 percent on Oct. 2.

more...

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-02-02/rates-less-than-zero-is-bank-stress-fed-wants-to-test-in-2016

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Fed Wants to Test How Banks Would Handle Negative Rates (Original Post) Purveyor Feb 2016 OP
In terms of policis, this is bad for Hillary and good for Bernie. JDPriestly Feb 2016 #1
I should understand this stuff but jomin41 Feb 2016 #2

jomin41

(559 posts)
2. I should understand this stuff but
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 06:55 PM
Feb 2016

things were simpler when I studied economics and I slept through "Money and Banking" so...

Anyway, looking at the global picture, it seems that there is so much money around that it's not worth anything. In fact, if you want to loan me some, you've got to pay me to take it. Is that the deal? People are searching frantically for a lucrative place to stash their millions, inflating one market after another. Commodities, housing, stocks, bitcoins(?), risky tech ventures, movies. But, if you want safety, you gotta pay for it. Makes me laugh for some reason. Is this a result of under-investment plus low wages or what?

So, "Loose" money is good for Bernie because he's the one who wants to raise some(more)? Sounds good.

On edit: http://www.democraticunderground.com/111676115 More info here.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The Fed Wants to Test How...