Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 10:48 AM Mar 2016

With TPP 'At Heart' of Obama Agenda, Critics Debunk Trade Talking Points

3/2/2016

Facing an uphill battle to convince Congress and public, White House says 2016 will be 'historic year for US trade policy'

by
Deirdre Fulton, staff writer

The White House is gearing up for a full-court press in support of the corporate-friendly Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), launching its latest public relations campaign in favor of the deal on Wednesday with a "flashy" annual trade agenda.

The TPP is "at the heart of this agenda," declares the document (pdf) released by the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR).

The 2016 blueprint also highlights the administration's efforts to conclude other controversial trade agreements, including the TransAtlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) between the U.S. and Europe and the Trade in Services Agreement (TISA), currently being negotiated by the U.S., EU, and 22 other countries that account for two-thirds of global GDP.

"We expect this to be an historic year for U.S. trade policy," said USTR Michael Froman.

in full: http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/03/02/tpp-heart-obama-agenda-critics-debunk-trade-talking-points

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
1. Oh, it will be historic, all right.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 10:50 AM
Mar 2016

The fucking over of workers and countries by global corporations. In a few very fell and long-planned swoops.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
3. Yes, I think there is another debate Sunday night. Bernie may be reluctant to speak
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 11:19 AM
Mar 2016

against Obama policy since Clinton tries to use that against him but she is suppose to be against it too.
He needs to bring up TPP even if the moderators leave it out.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
5. He wants TPP and more voters need to be aware about what that means. I hope Bernie
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:07 PM
Mar 2016

will draw Clinton out since she claims to be opposed. It also
brings up this threat Clinton cynically uses against him..the
you don't respect Obama meme.

The facts are that most Democrats are against it and Obama can
get personal too when it suits him.

Obama & TPP: Every One That Doeth Evil Hateth the Light

By William K. Black
Quito: April 25, 2015

President Obama wants the world to know that he takes it personally that the Democratic Party’s base opposes his latest effort to sell out the people of the world to the worst corporations through the infamous Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) deal. Obama blurted out at a press conference a number of conservative Republican memes as his sole basis for pushing TPP. He then launched personal attacks on Senator Elizabeth Warren and labor leaders (without naming them). Obama, who is famous for keeping his cool when criticized by the GOP, is thin-skinned when criticized by Democrats. Obama never raged at the Republicans’ “death panel” attacks on him, but he raged at Warren as supposedly making an equivalently openly dishonest attack on TPP’s secret drafting process.

One of the most reprehensible aspects of TPP is that it is (still) being drafted in secret – that it from us, the people – but with corporate lobbyists literally drafting their wish list. Obama made the critical mistake of personally attacking Warren, which is roughly equivalent to a small town mayor launching a personal attack on Jon Stewart. You know the results will be that Stewart will wipe the floor with the mayor.

Or, to move the metaphor to Hollywood, the character playing the President in the movie The American President warns his political opponent to limit his attacks to the President rather than his girlfriend: “you better stick with me, ’cause Sydney Ellen Wade is way out of your league.” Warren is way out of Obama’s league in this arena of protecting the American people from CEOs’ frauds and abuses. Obama is the one who infamously told the bankers he was protecting them from the American people’s demands for the restoration of the rule of law so that the banksters would be held accountable for leading the fraud epidemics that drove the financial crisis and the Great Depression. Obama, being Obama, phrased that in the form of a vile slander of the American people, claiming that they wanted to use “pitchforks” rather than prosecutions.

Here is the “money quote” from Warren and Senator Sherrod Brown’s letter responding to Obama’s attack.

“‘Executives of the country’s biggest corporations and their lobbyists already have had significant opportunities not only to read [the TPP text], but to shape its terms,’ the letter reads. ‘The Administration’s 28 trade advisory committees on different aspects of the TPP have a combined 566 members, and 480 of those members, or 85%, are senior corporate executives or industry lobbyists. Many of the advisory committees — including those on chemicals and pharmaceuticals, textiles and clothing, and services and finance — are made up entirely of industry representatives.’”

In sum, Obama stacked the committees to ensure that the CEOs’ lobbyists would completely dominate the secret drafting of TPP. And everyone in America know that the result of that has to be a Faux Trade agreement crafted to allow the CEOs to plunder with impunity.

Obama is demanding an additional reprehensible element – “fast track” – in which the cynical “CEOs’ Christmas in May” deal cannot be amended to remove even the most despicable provisions of the bill placed like land mines by the CEOs’ lobbyists. I don’t think opposing the TPP should be a partisan issue. Republicans should help lead the effort to stop Obama’s latest sell out.

TPP, of course, is being sold through a full court press of the economists who brought us the financial crisis and the Great Recession and the multiple Great Depressions in Spain, Italy, and Greece. Their lie, as always, is that this travesty of special interest deals drafted overwhelmingly by corporate lobbyists represents “free trade.” They first torture the language and truth before they torture the world.

TPP is the opposite of “free trade.” In the jargon of its economic supporters, it is a moldering midden hiding the secretly drafted “rent seeking” provisions designed to help CEOs enrich themselves at the expense of the people of the world. Adam Smith, who supported freer trade, warned over two centuries ago that when CEOs meet secretly it promptly turns into a conspiracy against the public interest and warned that CEOs use their power to aid their own interests at the expense of shareholders and the public. Smith’s warned that it “ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices.”

http://neweconomicperspectives.org/2015/04/obama-tpp-every-one-that-doeth-evil-hateth-the-light.html





 

appal_jack

(3,813 posts)
6. Yes, excellent article.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:53 PM
Mar 2016

My point stands though that when Democratic politicians betray their stated values and core constituents so egregiously, Republicans win elections.



-app

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
7. And a point I am in full agreement with..we have our own up hill battles within our party.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 03:25 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie supporter here.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
8. Recommend! and..
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 04:43 PM
Mar 2016

Last edited Thu Mar 3, 2016, 05:19 PM - Edit history (1)

Since we have Bernie, Trump and latecomer Hillary all against the TPP, I wonder how Obama is going to try get it passed in the "dead of night" without having a huge backlash. Senator Jeff Sessions (ALA) came out against it this week and he does have some power/influence. I've read there are many other Repubs against it. Of course there are also many Dems and Repubs still for it..but, will Obama want to do this? I suspect he will, sadly. Its too important to his long time fundraisers for him not to.

Still I try to have some faint hope that this crazy, uncertain election year will put a scare into our Congress and they will defy Obama's wishes.


 

earthshine

(1,642 posts)
9. Old saying: when people show you who they are, believe them.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 04:44 PM
Mar 2016

This is who Obama is. He gave up on "the public option" in his first week of office. He just appointed a Republican as head of the FDA.

I voted for him twice with tremendous buyer's regret each time. But, what were the alternatives? McCain and Romney.

Folks, every time you have a problem with Debbie Wasserman Schultz, remember who is her boss. It is Obama. He is absolutely the leader of the Democratic Party and responsible for the choices that DWS makes.

And let us also remember which candidate wants to be Obama's third term, while we still have a choice.

Hillary was for the TPP until she was against it. If she wins, there will be more of this corporatist pandering.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
11. I know...we seem to be at a Crossroad for our Country..
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 09:59 PM
Mar 2016

but, then..We has been coming to that "Crossroad" through several elections for awhile, now. Mostly my whole life, actually.

What to do? Just "Keep on Keeping On" is all I can think about it, these days.

I stick with Bernie's "Revolution" whether he manages to win or not. Some of us grew up during times when "Revolution" was a buzzword, so its not new to us. Altruistically we will still bide our time waiting, hoping and working for a better world to leave behind.

Change is worth working for...if it doesn't kill Ya' with Frustration.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»With TPP 'At Heart' of Ob...