From 2012: "The Curse of Political Purity" by Garry Wills
Scathing, witty and relevant in presidential and midterm election years.
[url]http://www.nybooks.com/daily/2012/06/18/curse-political-purity/[/url]
The independents, too ignorant or inexperienced to recognize these basic facts, are the people most susceptible to lying flattery. They are called the good folk too inner-directed to follow a party line or run with the herd. They are like the idealistic imperialists with clean hands in Graham Greenes The Quiet Americanthey should wear leper bells to warn people of their vicinity.
The etherialists who are too good to stoop toward the lesser evil of politicsas if there were ever anything better than the lesser evil therenaively assume that if they just bring down the current system, or one part of it that has disappointed them, they can build a new and better thing of beauty out of the ruins. Of course they never get the tabula rasa on which to draw their ideal schemes. What they normally do is damage the party closest to their professed ideals. Third parties are run by people who make the best the enemy of their own good and bring down that good. Theodore Roosevelts Bull Moose variant of his own Republican Party drained enough Republican votes to let the Democrat, Woodrow Wilson, win. (His voters, believing he would not send our boys to war, saw the prince become a frog in World War I.) George H. W. Bush rightly believes he was sabotaged by the crypto-Republican Ross Perot, who helped Bill Clinton win. Ralph Nader siphoned crucial votes from Al Gore to give us George W. Bush.
All these brave independents say that there is not a dimes worth of difference between the two parties, and claim they can start history over, with candidates suddenly become as good as they are themselves. What they do is give us the worst of evils.
dogman
(6,073 posts)CBHagman
(16,986 posts)A strategy that produces the opposite of the stated intention is, to say the least, a self-destructive path.