Hillary Clinton may never be called to account for her role in Haiti’s ongoing political crisis
by Nikolas Barry-Shaw
Hillary Clinton may never be called to account for her role in Haitis ongoing political crisis.
Is Hillary Clintons presidential bid suffocating democracy in Haiti? A growing number of informed observers, both in Haiti and in the United States, think so. They contend that the former secretary of states political ambitions are having a profound effect on the Haitian electoral process. The islands deeply flawed elections held last August and October, backed by over $33 million in US funding triggered massive political unrest this past January. Coming on the heels of Michel Martellys disastrous presidency, the elections spotlight how badly Clintons attempts as secretary of state to direct Haitian politics have backfired. The unrest caused the final round of balloting to be suspended and sent the US State Department into damage-control mode. The departments overriding though unofficial concern over the past year has been to finish Haitis elections before the US general election campaign begins in earnest this summer. It desperately wants to keep the results of Clintons involvement in Haiti out of the media glare.
(snip)
Seitenfus has another explanation for their hostility to an independent investigation of the elections or the establishment of any kind of transitional government: They want to quickly elect a president in Haiti in order to not make any waves, so that Hillary Clintons campaign goes smoothly. The reason for the haste, Seitenfus argues, is that Clinton is to blame for both Michel Martellys disastrous presidency and the present crisis of Haitian democracy. During the 201011 elections, Clinton was determined to see Martelly elected. His pro-business outlook made him the ideal candidate to lead Haitis post-earthquake reconstruction. But, according to official (though strongly contested) results, he did not win enough votes in the first round to advance, so Clinton threw the full weight of the State Department behind her favored candidate. Clintons team exploited every pressure point: cutting off aid, denying visas to top government officials, even plotting a coup against then-president René Préval. In January 2011, Clinton, with the help of behind the scenes pressure from Haitis business elites, persuaded Préval to bump Martelly up to second place and into the next round, where he would win the presidential runoff. (...) The renegade diplomat is not the only one pointing the finger at Clinton. Many other analysts agree that the United States has unduly influenced the international response to the current elections, out of concern for her campaign.
(snip)
Sweet Mickeys presidency is only part of Clintons dismal history in Haiti. Jonathan Katz, who covered Haiti for the Associated Press before, during, and after the 2010 earthquake, argues that Americas rush to get past Haitis tumultuous elections stems from Clintons ongoing involvement in the failed reconstruction efforts. Instability in a place where she and her husband have planted a big flag would hardly help her campaign, he notes. Throughout her term as secretary of state, Clinton made Haiti one of her top foreign-policy priorities. She and her chief of staff Cheryl Mills closely managed the internationally financed effort to rebuild Haiti after the quake. Bill Clinton pitched in as co-chair of a commission tasked with approving reconstruction projects.
As Clinton wrote in her memoir Hard Choices, rebuilding Haiti was an opportunity . . . to road-test new approaches to development that could be applied more broadly around the world. Wielding an unparalleled level of influence over massive flows of public, private, and philanthropic capital, the Clintons set out to turn their slogan Haiti built back better into reality. As Katz told the Washington Post: Theres nowhere Clinton had more influence or respect when she became Secretary of State than in Haiti, and it was clear that she planned to use that to make Haiti the proving ground for her vision of American power. In retrospect, the Clintons bold, new vision for Haiti looks more like a mirage. The new approach was the same old sweatshop model of development, pursued by the United States since the Duvalier days, in a slick new package, and it had the same disastrous results.
(snip)
Perhaps most troubling from the Clinton campaigns perspective: the tiny handful of players who did profit from Haitis reconstruction includes several members of her inner circle, like Tony Rodham (Hillarys brother) and Irish billionaire Dennis OBrien, a fact that Peter Schweizer and other Republican critics delight in pointing out. Today, Clinton and her political managers prefer not to talk about Haiti at all. When Katz asked how her experience in Haiti shaped her fo
more at the link
ReasonableToo
(505 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)And guess what it gave us??? The entire Bush Sr administration again under his son GW. The Clintons cover-up for the Bushes.
enough
(13,259 posts)felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)must be an international crime.
liberal N proud
(60,338 posts)drokhole
(1,230 posts)Would be news to them, too:
Jacobin is a leading voice of the American left, offering socialist perspectives on politics, economics, and culture. The print magazine is released quarterly and reaches over 15,000 subscribers, in addition to a web audience of 700,000 a month.
Well-Deserved
The appearance of Jacobin magazine has been a bright light in dark times. Each issue brings penetrating, lively discussions and analyses of matters of real significance, from a thoughtful left perspective that is refreshing and all too rare. A really impressive contribution to sanity, and hope.
Noam Chomsky
Jacobin, whose ninth issue just landed, has certainly been an improbable hit, buoyed by the radical stirrings of the Occupy movement and a bitingly satirical but serious-minded style.
Jennifer Schuessler for the New York Times
I really like Jacobin its very explicitly on the radical left, and sort of hostile to liberal accommodationism. Theres a lot in there that I dont necessarily agree with, but its bracingly rigorous and polemical in a really thought-provoking way. Its a really well-done publication, almost preternaturally good.
Chris Hayes, host of All In w/ Chris Hayes
I love Jacobin, both the content and spirit. In a time of torpor bordering on despair, its great to see the youth embracing radical politics and serious thinking while also having some fun. And its a print magazine that looks great, too. Everyone should subscribe.
Doug Henwood, Left Business Observer
And MSNBC's Chris Hayes, apparently.
stupidicus
(2,570 posts)haiti is hardly the only thing she should be held to account for
jalan48
(13,873 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)... this November, I imagine knowledge of Hillary and Bill's proclivity for Neoliberalism will never make it into the M$N. Now you will be able to find it elsewhere, like on DemocracyNow or Thom Harmann, and websites like http://www.truthdig.com or http://www.commondreams.org or http://www.theintercept.com or right here on DU via links.
elmac
(4,642 posts)And are not all these so called blunders owned by the president?
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)But he's not the target now.
People seem to forget there were assholes here during the 2012 GE who were fucking undermining his re-election with passive aggressive "I don't live in a state that matters so I may stay home" type posts.
Which is why I laugh that people think this will all go away come September.
elmac
(4,642 posts)disappointed, yes, but not hate. In a perfect world we would have a president Sanders, a socialist Congress, a 90% tax rate on the uber rich and a minimum income. But this world will never be that perfect.
stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)Boy does she have foreign policy "experience".
Frightening that some people think she should be President. There will be consequences when a Kagan approved candidate assumes the Presidency.