Brexit is Only the Latest Proof of the Insularity and Failure of Western Establishment Institutions
The decision by UK voters to leave the EU is such a glaring repudiation of the wisdom and relevance of elite political and media institutions that for once their failures have become a prominent part of the storyline. Media reaction to the Brexit vote falls into two general categories: (1) earnest, candid attempts to understand what motivated voters to make this choice, even if that means indicting ones own establishment circles, and (2) petulant, self-serving, simple-minded attacks on disobedient pro-leave voters for being primitive, xenophobic bigots (and stupid to boot), all to evade any reckoning with their own responsibility. Virtually every reaction that falls into the former category emphasizes the profound failures of western establishment factions; these institutions have spawned pervasive misery and inequality, only to spew condescending scorn at their victims when they object.
The Los Angeles Times Vincent Bevins, in an outstanding and concise analysis, wrote that both Brexit and Trumpism are the very, very wrong answers to legitimate questions that urban elites have refused to ask for thirty years; in particular, since the 1980s the elites in rich countries have overplayed their hand, taking all the gains for themselves and just covering their ears when anyone else talks, and now they are watching in horror as voters revolt. The British journalist Tom Ewing, in a comprehensive Brexit explanation, said the same dynamic driving the UK vote prevails in Europe and North America as well: the arrogance of neoliberal elites in constructing a politics designed to sideline and work around democracy while leaving democracy formally intact.
In an interview with The New Statesman, the political philosopher Michael Sandel also said that the dynamics driving the pro-Brexit sentiment were now dominant throughout the west generally: a large constituency of working-class voters feel that not only has the economy left them behind, but so has the culture, that the sources of their dignity, the dignity of labour, have been eroded and mocked by developments with globalisation, the rise of finance, the attention that is lavished by parties across the political spectrum on economic and financial elites, the technocratic emphasis of the established political parties. After the market-venerating radicalism of Reagan and Thatcher, he said, the centre left Blair and Clinton and various European parties managed to regain political office but failed to reimagine the mission and purpose of social democracy, which became empty and obsolete.
Three Guardian writers sounded similar themes about elite media ignorance, stemming from their homogeneity and detachment from the citizenry. John Harris quoted a Manchester voter as explaining that if youve got money, you vote in. If you havent got money, you vote out, and Harris added: most of the media . . . failed to see this coming. . . . The alienation of the people charged with documenting the national mood from the people who actually define it is one of the ruptures that has led to this moment. Gary Younge similarly denounced a section of the London-based commentariat [that] anthropologised the British working class as though they were a lesser evolved breed from distant parts, all too often portraying them as bigots who did not know what was good for them. Ian Jacks article was headlined In this Brexit vote, the poor turned on an elite who ignored them, and he described how gradually the sight of empty towns and shuttered shops became normalised or forgotten. Headlines like this one from The Guardian in 2014 were prescient but largely ignored:
https://theintercept.com/2016/06/25/brexit-is-only-the-latest-proof-of-the-insularity-and-failure-of-western-establishment-institutions/
bemildred
(90,061 posts)---
Recent examples of multi-national empires that were unable to make a go of it include the Ottoman Empire, the USSR, Yugoslavia, and the British Empire
and maybe the EU.
Which brings us back to Brexit and the attendant hysterics.
There is a not unfounded fear that a genuine Brexit, if it does occur, would embolden right-wing nationalists in the Netherlands, France etc. to vote their countries out of the EU and collapse it.
I am not particularly sympathetic to xenophobic and racist hatred of outsiders that motivates a lot of right-wing nationalism in Europe, but my thesis is racism feeds on failure and the failures of the EU have been pretty epic.
http://atimes.com/2016/06/the-brexit-upside-for-china/
Igel
(35,350 posts)It feeds on failure, to be sure.
It feeds on fear of failure.
It feeds on success, which just means there's greater chance of loss.
My thesis: It feeds on greed, either allowing you to get more than the other group and keep it, or dispose of another group's advantages and provides for equality of state (and, one often quietly hopes, that may allow for superiority over the other group).
Equality has usually been obtained when the risk of war or attack as a result of having additional advantages outweighs the desirability of the advantages. That's what a lot of the proposed legislation to achieve higher equality in the US boils down to--"if you have more, we'll confiscate it or punish you for it."
5000 years of recorded history seldom shows otherwise. The best you can do without yielding to dictatorship and oppression of at least a minority if not a clear majority is to focus on equality of process not equality of outcome.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)You focus on the fear. Insecure people get fearful about all sorts of things, strangers of all sorts are obvious targets. If you want peace, make sure everybody feels secure.
xocet
(3,871 posts)"I don't want a future in which politics is primarily a battle between cosmopolitan finance capitalism and ethno-nationalist backlash."
Christopher Hayes (@chrislhayes) June 24, 2016
But that is exactly the choice presented not only by Brexit but also western elections generally, including the 2016 Clinton v. Trump General Election (just look at the powerful array of Wall Street tycoons and war-loving neocons which long before Trump viewed the former Democratic New York Senator and Secretary of State as their best hope for having their agenda and interests served). When democracy is preserved only in form, structured to change little to nothing about power distribution, people naturally seek alternatives for the redress of their grievances, particularly when they suffer.
https://theintercept.com/2016/06/25/brexit-is-only-the-latest-proof-of-the-insularity-and-failure-of-western-establishment-institutions/
It brings up points related to the universality of causes that are rarely discussed.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras has pointed the finger squarely at EU leaders for the outcome of the EU referendum last Thursday.
Tsipras referenced the chronic deficiencies of the EU leadership, and claimed that its insistence on austerity policies were the driving force behind the UKs vote to leave.
Speaking at the Syriza party central committee on Saturday, Tsipras said: "As much as the decision of the British people saddens us, it is a decision to be respected.
Having led his Syriza party to two general election wins in 2015, both giving him a mandate to end the years of austerity, Tsipras and his government were subsequently forced accept restrictions on public spending in order to obtain eurozone bailouts. Such bailouts ensured Greeces continued membership of the eurozone and helped the country service its significant debt pile.
http://www.cityam.com/244169/tsipras-claims-brexit-vote-due-eu-austerity
Denzil_DC
(7,256 posts)The UK has fiscal autonomy. The Tories need no encouragement to impose austerity - they've been its main cheerleaders, and unfortunately Labour is willing to offer a watered-down version. It's not EU-imposed in the UK's case. Claiming it is lets the Tories off the hook.
They now have a superb pretext for ramping up their austerity measures under the guise of coping with the hardship and upheaval ahead.
It's understandable Tsipras would want to try to use the vote to complain about Greece's treatment, though.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)I think there are chains of sometimes obscure causes and effects at work, but what do I know?
I think people are tired of being fucked over by the economy, being kept insecure, assetless, and rootless, fine-farmed and fee-farmed and incarcerated or hospitalized to produce a revenue stream. Treated like cattle basically, objects to exploit for money however one can, by business and government both. Lied to and manipulated by schemers and hucksters to make a buck.
Which is a very unnatural condition for human beings, and we find various not necessarily rational ways to express that.
Edit: I want to mention here that this grasping attitude in government and economic elites was ubiquitous in the Roman empire in decline too, they always needed more money for more weapons for distant battles too, more money for more ostentation too. It is not a sign of vibrant economic and social life.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)LONDON/BEIJING (Reuters) Turmoil unleashed by Britains vote to leave the European Union heightened anxiety in Asia on Sunday, with China, Japan and South Korea all fretting over the risk to world financial stability a few hours before markets reopen.
Chinas finance minister said fallout from Thursdays referendum will cast a shadow over the global economy while a senior official in Tokyo warned of the danger of speculative, violent moves in currencies.
In Britain, open political conflict spread from the ruling Conservatives to the opposition, and senior Labour lawmakers attempted a coup against their leader after traditional supporters rejected the partys pro-EU stand in droves.
Splits widened across the nation. Over three million Britons signed a petition demanding a re-run of the referendum, with the number climbing by the hour, and an opinion poll showed a large majority of Scots now want to break with the United Kingdom.
http://atimes.com/2016/06/fallout-from-british-eu-vote-alarms-asia-deepens-party-conflicts/
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Not for the lack of trying in a lot of quarters, though.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Clinton is talking about expanding social security, even the Republican is against austerity party policies.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Whether they will prevail remains to be seen. Given the dumbing down of the electorate, the polluted information environment, and prevailing real-world social isolation, I don't think we can really rely on them to bail us out by their good sense, and the media has lost control too. All of this lying has consequences, as I and a few other posters here have pointed out.
We need reform, deep and strong, they need help from the government now, some reason to not go all Samson on us in November.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)A diverse electorate is harder to dumb down. And that's why demographics help distinguish us from the UK, or the Republican primaries.
No one sniffs out bullshit faster than African-American voters.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)And there isn't really anybody else on offer that I think can measure up, has the temperament and the brains to keep a handle on what is happening. And he would still have a divided Congress and a divided electorate.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)He's definitely had his mistakes, but he's shown a rare ability to learn from his mistakes while in office
bemildred
(90,061 posts)I've been against it forever, like term limits it is intended to prevent voters from controlling election outcomes "too much", on the theory that elites fend off mistakes or something. But all of history shows elites to be self-serving assholes, as a class, so I think we have to go with the public, error prone though they may be.