The DNC Contenders Are Not Interested In Your Populist Moment
I am not angry anymore. Wastes too much energy. I am back #teamPerez
The DNC Contenders Are Not Interested In Your Populist Moment
Rank-and-file voters are angry, but nobody told the candidates.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/dnc-debate-courage-opposition_us_58803552e4b02c1837e9bf7f?section=us_politics
01/19/2017 12:27 am ET | Updated 5 hours ago
WASHINGTON ― The seven leading candidates to serve as the next chair of the Democratic National Committee gathered at George Washington University on Wednesday night to dodge key questions about party reform and pander to the 447 insiders who will elect the next Democratic leader.
At a debate sponsored by The Huffington Post, contenders repeatedly called for unity and made vague calls for better organizing while sidestepping important issues about how the DNC should govern its future affairs.
Many committed Democrats are following the DNC race as a fight for the future of the party. After a devastating presidential defeat and nearly a decade of steady losses in Congress and at the state level, there arent many other political battles for party activists to focus on. But the candidates themselves are not catering to grass-roots organizers or rank-and-file voters. Theyre seeking the support of a majority of DNC members ― mostly state party leaders and political appointees ― and doing their damnedest to avoid ruffling any feathers. If any of the candidates on stage Wednesday were auditioning to serve as the opposition leader against President-elect Donald Trump, s/he managed to fool everyone.
Damon Scheleur/The Huffington Post
The Huffington Post hosted a debate among seven Democratic National Committee chair candidates on Wednesday.
None were willing to call for an end to state caucuses ― complex presidential nominating processes that undermine a one-person-one-vote framework. When asked what the party should do about superdelegates ― party insiders the DNC has long granted special influence over its presidential nomination ― no candidate would support simply scuttling the undemocratic system. Former Fox News commentator Jehmu Greene spoke for the slate by arguing Democrats need to be the party of innovation on the superdelegate question.
Coincidentally, members of the Democratic National Committee who get to vote for the DNC chair also serve as superdelegates in the presidential nominating process.
.........................................................
All seven candidates also agreed the DNC needs to be involved in street-fighting, protests and direct action.
Damon Scheleur/The Huffington Post
?cache=1k43ncb9tg
Labor Secretary Tom Perez was the only DNC chair contender calling for across-the-board obstruction to Donald Trumps agenda.
Labor Secretary Tom Perez, alone among the contenders, appeared to call for across-the-board obstruction to Trumps agenda, registering the most rhetorically potent moment of the evening. We can hit [Trump] between the eyes with a two-by-four and treat him like Mitch McConnell treated Barack Obama.
............................................
It would make the next DNC chairs job easy if Democrats could agree about everything all the time. But there are genuine disputes within the party over how to move forward in a moment of historic political impotence. On Wednesday night, nobody was willing to light the way.
vi5
(13,305 posts)..but if he seriously means that, then he's the man for the job.
The problem with the whole being o.k. with Democrats differences, is how do we actually get stuff done? If for every issue there are a few Democrats who throw a wrench in the works, and every time they do so we're all supposed to go "Oh, it's o.k. they are with us most of the time." then nothing is going to get done.
"Oh, that drug bill didn't pass because Senators X, Y, and Z didn't vote for it......that's o.k. don't be mean to them because they vote with us the other 90% of the time".
"Oh, that jobs bill didn't pass because senators A, B, and C didn't vote for it.....that's o.k. don't be mean to them, they vote with us the other 90% of the time."
"Oh, that abortion access bill didn't pass because Senators D, E, and F didn't vote for it. That's o.k they vote with us the other 90% of the time.
I get it when it comes to the house as it rarely comes down to just a handful of Dems. But in the Senate there has to be some degree of lockstep or we are never going to get anything done, and that will always have to be o.k. because every Senator has their own priorities.
Leith
(7,809 posts)There are some powerful voices on the left that The People listen to because they like what they hear. But the power brokers insist on sitting in their back rooms taking money from corporations.
We can just say "bubbye" to 2018 right now.
elleng
(130,963 posts)Posted it here, to little interest.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=8494251
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)the art of compromise, because at this rate nobody on Earth will be pure enough for them to support as head of the DNC...
As an aside I'm happy to see so many people pay attention to an office which has mostly been treated as an afterthought for as long as I can remember...
alarimer
(16,245 posts)Perez has said that he won't ban lobbyist or corporate donations. If so, that's a bad idea. Democrats need to get away from being beholden to corporate interests and return to the roots. Start being the party of labor unions again. Use FDR's the Four Freedoms as a starting point and the Second Bill of Rights as a template for what is needed.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)"Populism" delivered Trump to the White House...