What Investigation? G.O.P. Responds to F.B.I. Inquiry by Changing Subject
By MICHAEL D. SHEAR MARCH 20, 2017
WASHINGTON The headline from Capitol Hill on Monday was bracing: confirmation of a criminal investigation into connections between associates of a sitting president and Russian operatives during a presidential election.
But the response from Republicans was almost as striking: During hours of testimony in which James B. Comey, the F.B.I. director, acknowledged the inquiry, they shrugged off its implications and instead offered a coordinated effort to defend President Trump by demanding a focus on leaks to news organizations.
Throughout the 5½-hour hearing before the House Intelligence Committee, as Democrats tried to highlight the criminal investigation, Republicans demanded a renewed focus on how its existence was revealed in news reports months ago.
When Democrats raised the issue of Mr. Trumps Twitter posts accusing former President Barack Obama of wiretapping him and Mr. Comey said the F.B.I. had no information that supports those tweets Republicans railed against leaks.
When Democrats pressed Mr. Comey on evidence of coordination between Mr. Trumps associates and Russian operatives, Republicans questioned the F.B.I. director about how the names of those associates became public in news reports.
more
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/20/us/politics/republicans-leaks-defend-trump.html?emc=edit_th_20170321&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=57435284
Orrex
(63,213 posts)Trump petulantly complained about leaks being reported by "fake news," but if they're fake news then what's the harm in fake-ly reporting about the leaks?
Now Republicans are petulantly complaining not about the potentially nation-shattering crimes of this administration but rather about the revelation of those crimes.
At what point does their deliberate misdirection begin to count as deliberate obstruction?
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)What a warped view and sense of what's right in this world.