Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Subject for Debate: Are Women People? (Jessica Winter, Time)
http://ideas.time.com/2012/03/07/subject-for-debate-are-women-people/All my adult life, Ive been pretty sure Im a sentient, even semi-competent human being. I have a job and an apartment; I know how to read and vote; I make regular, mostly autonomous decisions about what to eat for lunch and which cat videos I will watch whilst eating my lunch. But in the past couple of months, certain powerful figures in media and politics have cracked open that certitude.
You see, like most women, I was born with the chromosome abnormality known as XX, a deviation of the normative XY pattern. Symptoms of XX, which affects slightly more than half of the American population, include breasts, ovaries, a uterus, a menstrual cycle, and the potential to bear and nurse children. Now, many would argue even today that the lack of a Y chromosome should not affect my ability to make informed choices about what health care options and lunchtime cat videos are right for me. But others have posited, with increasing volume and intensity, that XX is a disability, even a roadblock on the evolutionary highway. This debate has reached critical mass, and leaves me uncertain of my legal and moral status. Am I a person? An object? A ward of the state? A prostitute? (And if Im the last of these, where do I drop off my W-2?)
In the hopes of clarifying these and other issues, below Ive recapped recent instances of powerful men from the fields of law, politics and literature tackling the question that has captured Americas imagination: Are Women People?
Read more: http://ideas.time.com/2012/03/07/subject-for-debate-are-women-people/#ixzz1oTz3XPrl
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1572 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Subject for Debate: Are Women People? (Jessica Winter, Time) (Original Post)
swag
Mar 2012
OP
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)1. Save Ann Coulter ,the best of our Species
Honey pie,Mom and my little sister are the most resposible , problem solving people I know.
saras
(6,670 posts)2. Biologically you have it backwards. XX is normative. The Y chromosome is a latecomer.
What's more, the Y chromosome is losing its genes and may eventually disappear entirely, another failed evolutionary experiment.
ejpoeta
(8,933 posts)3. since there are more women than men, I would posit that the xy chromosome
is the abnormality if there is one. there is a reason why some want to control women.... we are the only ones who can bring a life into this world. We have control over that and they can't stand it. And no I am not saying all men... I am saying the ones that want to control us and keep us in the kitchen and taking care of the kids.
swag
(26,488 posts)4. One never asks everyone to understand satire.
chknltl
(10,558 posts)5. The only reason this is in Good Reads Forum...
... is because DU doesn't have a Great Reads Forum! bookmarked and shared.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)6. You are only a person if you have plenty of money, that's the criteria.
Always has been, look around.