Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,452 posts)
Fri Apr 14, 2017, 04:20 PM Apr 2017

There's a quick and easy way to see Trump's tax returns

There's a quick and easy way to see Trump's tax returns

By Daniel Hemel

April 11

Daniel Hemel is an assistant professor at the University of Chicago Law School.

State lawmakers across the country are pursuing creative methods to force President Trump to release his federal income tax returns before he can run for reelection in 2020. Unfortunately for citizens interested in greater presidential transparency, those efforts are likely to fail. ... There is, however, a much easier way for state lawmakers to force the disclosure of Trump’s tax information: publishing the state tax returns already in their possession, which would reveal much of the same information appearing in his federal documents.
....

The ballot-access approach faces three formidable obstacles: First, Democrats control both the governor slot and legislatures in only half a dozen states. Republicans are likely to block the bills from becoming law anywhere else. New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, a Republican, is widely expected to veto his state’s ballot-access bill.
....

New York’s Department of Taxation and Finance keeps copies of Trump’s state returns from as far back as 1990. Current New York law prohibits state tax officials from disclosing an individual’s returns, but the New York legislature could amend that law to require the state tax authority to post the president’s returns from the past quarter-century on its website. For the sake of evenhandedness, the legislature might apply the same rule to its other elected officials. Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo is unlikely to object: He releases his returns every year, as do the state’s two senators, fellow Democrats Charles E. Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand.

Federal law does not stand in New York’s way. The Internal Revenue Code prohibits state officials from disclosing a taxpayer’s federal return, but it does not stop New York from disclosing information that Trump reports on his state forms.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

stuffmatters

(2,574 posts)
2. Do it fast, beforeTrump & his Corruption Congress pass a law protecting Trump from NYS.
Fri Apr 14, 2017, 05:05 PM
Apr 2017

Cuomo & Dems in NYS legislature should have already gotten this done months ago. As soon as Trump hears of this loophole, he's going to overnight protect himself.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
4. The problem, as so often in New York, is the State Senate.
Sat Apr 15, 2017, 09:26 PM
Apr 2017

A coalition of Republicans and turncoat Democrats holds the majority. I don't see any way of getting this proposal enacted right now. The only hope would be if the 2018 elections, while preserving Democratic control of the governorship (probable) and the State Assembly (virtually certain), also flip the State Senate (alas, odds against).

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
7. First, the Republicans are a minority in the State Senate
Sun Apr 16, 2017, 04:43 PM
Apr 2017

The most important point is not "so many Republicans" but the sleazeball Democrats who enable them.

Second, New York State is blue overall but has many rural and suburban areas where the GOP is strong.

Third, and this should be no surprise here, is the gerrymandering. For decades, the Assembly was reliably Democratic and the Senate reliably Republican. Every ten years, each party proposes a redistricting plan that benefits it. Regardless of who's Governor, neither party can get its plan through the chamber of the Legislature that's controlled by the other. If they can't agree, the courts might have to step in and order fair and impartial redistricting, which none of the politicians want. Therefore, they compromise, and the compromise is always the same one: The Democrats get to draw the Assembly lines, to protect their incumbents and screw over the other party, and the Republicans get to do the same for the Senate. Thus, at the next redistricting, the Assembly is still reliably Democratic and the Senate is still reliably Republican. It's only comparatively recently that, as the state became more blue, the Democrats have had even a shot at controlling the Senate (and they did briefly control it a few years ago, before the IDC backstabbing).

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
5. You'd have to get that law past the NY State Senate-
Sun Apr 16, 2017, 07:37 AM
Apr 2017

-which is currently (and will probably always be) controlled by a Republican/right-wing Dem coalition(the bad kind of Ed Koch-worshipping Dems who would STILL be "Democrats for Nixon" if the Trickster came back from the dead).

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»There's a quick and easy ...