The Crisis of Attention Theft - Ads That Steal Your Time for Nothing in Return
BY NOW, IT is pretty well understood that we regularly pay for things in ways other than using money. Sometimes we pay still with cash. But we also pay for things with data, and more often, with our time and attention. We effectively hand over access to our minds in exchange for something free, like email, Facebook, or football games on TV. As opposed to paying attention, we actually spend attention, agreeing to the view ads in exchange for something we really want.
The centrality of that deal in our lives makes it outrageous that there are companies who seize our time and attention for absolutely nothing in exchange, and indeed, without consent at allotherwise known as attention theft. Consider, for example, the innovation known as Gas Station TVthat is, the televisions embedded in gasoline pumps that blast advertising and other pseudo-programming at the captive pumper. There is no escape: as the CEO of Gas Station TV puts it, We like to say youre tied to that screen with an 8-foot rubber hose for about five minutes. It is an invention that singlehandedly may have created a new case for the electric car.
Attention theft happens anywhere you find your time and attention taken without consent. The most egregious examples are found where, like at the gas station, we are captive audiences. In that genre are things like the new, targeted advertising screens found in hospital waiting rooms (broadcasting things like The Newborn Channel for expecting parents); the airlines that play full-volume advertising from a screen right in front of your face; the advertising-screens in office elevators; or that universally unloved invention known as Taxi TV. These are just few examples in what is a growing category. Combined, they threaten to make us live life in a screen-lined cocoon, yet one that leaves us more like larva than butterflies, shrunken and incapable of independent thought.
What makes it theft? Advances in neuroscience over the last several decades make it clear that our brains resources are involuntarily triggered by sound and motion; hence the screens literally seize scarce mental resources. As neuroscientist Adam Gazzaley and psychologist Larry Rosen put it in their book, The Distracted Mind, humans have an extreme sensitivity to goal interference from distractions by irrelevant information. Meanwhile, in the law, theft or larceny is typically defined as the taking control of a resource under such circumstances as to acquire the major portion of its economic value or benefit. Given the established market value of time and attention, when taken without consent or compensation, it really is not much different from someone taking money out of your pocket. Hence, when the firms selling public-screen advertising to captive audiences brag of double-digit growth and billions in revenue, those are actually earnings derived by stealing from us.
More: https://www.wired.com/2017/04/forcing-ads-captive-audience-attention-theft-crime/
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)I'm a sucker for "Look what these 70's starts look like now!"
Rhiannon12866
(205,552 posts)But I admit that it got my attention, exactly what they said, for the time it took me to pump my gas. I'm guessing that's why I found this on GasBuddy - and I thought a Wired article was worth passing on...
lostnfound
(16,184 posts)Our highways littered with distracting ads when we could be enjoying beautiful scenery. Instead of billboards displaying garish messages, wouldn't it be cool if they were covered in real art, for a change? Uplifting gets replaced with trash, if it sells.
Kind of like replacing Obama with Trump.