Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,004 posts)
Tue Apr 10, 2018, 02:30 PM Apr 2018

A growing threat to local coverage of news

By now most have seen the video mash-up of scores of local TV news anchors from across the country reading a brief commentary appearing to express each station’s commitment to factual reporting.

Viewed separately, the spots could have been dismissed by viewers as innocuous and easily ignorable station promos. But in the video produced by the news and blog website Deadspin, which combined the commentaries from many of the 193 televisions stations owned by Sinclair Broadcast Group, the segments become an increasingly eerie in-unison incantation that makes the anchors sound like the cybernetic Borg of “Star Trek” lore.

The script for the segment read by anchors — including Sinclair-owned KOMO-TV, Channel 4, in Seattle — varied little among all stations and was typically read by one or two anchors at each station. With the push from the Deadspin video, condemnation of the statement and how it was handled at each station was widespread across the media landscape and even among more than a few Sinclair employees, anonymously and publicly.

Mandated by Sinclair’s national ownership as “must-run” segments, local stations were not given a choice in broadcasting them and employees were not allowed to opt out of recording them. Even resignation was not a viable option for most employees, as a Bloomberg report showed: Most Sinclair employment contracts contain non-compete clauses and require hefty fees to compensate Sinclair for its investment in employees — up to 40 percent of an annual contract — in order to leave before the end of a contract.

Along with its heavy-handed approach with its employees, the content of the segments went beyond a simple statement reflecting commitment to accuracy, fairness and accountability; the segments dragged in the spectre of “fake news,” using a broad brush to vilify other unnamed media outlets for publishing “fake stories, stories that just aren’t true, without checking facts first.”

http://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/editorial-a-growing-threat-to-local-coverage-of-news/?utm_source=DAILY+HERALD&utm_campaign=b39f0ba715-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d81d073bb4-b39f0ba715-228635337

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A growing threat to local coverage of news (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2018 OP
If Consumers Would Simply Turn Off All Sinclair Owned Stations, ... DoctorJoJo Apr 2018 #1
 

DoctorJoJo

(1,134 posts)
1. If Consumers Would Simply Turn Off All Sinclair Owned Stations, ...
Tue Apr 10, 2018, 04:16 PM
Apr 2018

... as I do, they would simply die on the vine, as the gods would want! We have two in my city, but fortunately they are FOX and ABC (basically FOX Light), so no big loss.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»A growing threat to local...