Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Candidates with STEM backgrounds are running for Congress this year in unprecedented numbers
RogueAltGov Retweeted:Candidates with science and technical backgrounds are running for Congress this year in unprecedented numbers.
Link to tweet
POLICY & ETHICS
For Scientists Running for Congress, Victory Doesn't Depend on Science
Engineers, researchers, physicians have won or lost primary races based on other factors
By David S. Rauf on July 17, 2018
Aruna Miller entered Junes Democratic primary for a highly prized Maryland seat in the U.S. Congress with several advantages. She had seven opponents, but Miller had pulled in the most money from outside donors, was already a state lawmaker and had locked down endorsements from more than two-dozen of her colleagues, and had gender on her sidewomen in 2018 are outperforming expectations in U.S. federal election primaries across the country.
But Miller, a civil engineer running to represent Marylands sprawling 6th District, ran into a daunting obstacle: a business magnate who spent more than $10 million of his own money on the campaign, dwarfing the roughly $1.3 million that Miller raised. David Trones big money helped innundate voters with his name and his messages, and Miller lost by 10 percentage points.
Candidates with science and technical backgrounds like Miller are running for Congress this year in unprecedented numbers, prompted by Trump administration policies on the environment and health that run counter to scientific evidence. Roughly midway to Novembers general election, the candidates have reaped a mixed bag of wins and losses. Seventeen people backed by 314 Action, a group recruiting and training such candidates, have been in a primary or special election so far. Eight advanced and nine lost. Four primaries are upcoming in August.
The results show that many factors decide primary outcomes, not just a candidates support of evidence-based policies or their background in a STEM field. But some of these people have already proven quite capable on the campaign trail and election handicapping experts predict several candidates have good odds of winning in the big election in November.
....
For Scientists Running for Congress, Victory Doesn't Depend on Science
Engineers, researchers, physicians have won or lost primary races based on other factors
By David S. Rauf on July 17, 2018
Aruna Miller entered Junes Democratic primary for a highly prized Maryland seat in the U.S. Congress with several advantages. She had seven opponents, but Miller had pulled in the most money from outside donors, was already a state lawmaker and had locked down endorsements from more than two-dozen of her colleagues, and had gender on her sidewomen in 2018 are outperforming expectations in U.S. federal election primaries across the country.
But Miller, a civil engineer running to represent Marylands sprawling 6th District, ran into a daunting obstacle: a business magnate who spent more than $10 million of his own money on the campaign, dwarfing the roughly $1.3 million that Miller raised. David Trones big money helped innundate voters with his name and his messages, and Miller lost by 10 percentage points.
Candidates with science and technical backgrounds like Miller are running for Congress this year in unprecedented numbers, prompted by Trump administration policies on the environment and health that run counter to scientific evidence. Roughly midway to Novembers general election, the candidates have reaped a mixed bag of wins and losses. Seventeen people backed by 314 Action, a group recruiting and training such candidates, have been in a primary or special election so far. Eight advanced and nine lost. Four primaries are upcoming in August.
The results show that many factors decide primary outcomes, not just a candidates support of evidence-based policies or their background in a STEM field. But some of these people have already proven quite capable on the campaign trail and election handicapping experts predict several candidates have good odds of winning in the big election in November.
....
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1026 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Candidates with STEM backgrounds are running for Congress this year in unprecedented numbers (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2018
OP
malthaussen
(17,065 posts)1. Doubt they can be much worse than a pack of lawyers.
Too many lawyers and poli sci people are definable as "someone adept at evading the law."
-- Mal
mopinko
(69,806 posts)3. eggzactly
i have come to the conclusion that law school is there to teach you how to get around the law, or change the law to suit your purposes.
Aristus
(66,090 posts)2. Good. We need to kick out the "Ah doan't bleeve global warmin' is happ'nin' " crowd.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)4. Looks like a decent percentage of them are winning, too.
It would be great to have some smart people in office for a change.