Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(130,964 posts)
Mon Mar 18, 2019, 12:53 PM Mar 2019

Democrats Pledged to Lower Health Costs. They Just Haven't Figured Out How.

(It's called COMPETITION, as provided for Federal employees/retirees.)

' No issue animated the Democrats’ 2018 congressional campaigns like health care and the promises to expand access to insurance and to lower costs. But as House Democrats sit down to draft their vision of governance in the coming weeks, lawmakers find themselves badly divided on the issue that delivered their majority.

Centrists from swing districts, with the tacit support of Speaker Nancy Pelosi, favor incremental moves to shore up the Affordable Care Act and to lower the out-of-pocket costs of prescription drugs and medical care. They are pushing a variety of measures, such as shutting down cheap, short-term insurance plans that do not cover pre-existing medical conditions and allowing people to buy into Medicare at age 50 or 55.

“We have very practical solutions that we can implement immediately,” said Representative Kim Schrier, Democrat of Washington, who is also a pediatrician. “We don’t have the luxury of time right now to wait for a full overhaul of our health care system.”

But they are butting up against an aggressive and expanding group of more than 100 outspoken Democrats — as well as at least four of the party’s presidential candidates — who want to do just that, upend the whole system with a single government insurance plan for all Americans — the old concept of single-payer, now called “Medicare for all.” . .

Ms. Pelosi cannot afford to put moderate freshmen in Trump-friendly districts on the spot by putting Medicare for all up to a vote. . .

Backers of Medicare for all say that, if framed correctly around saving health care costs, it can appeal to voters in more moderate districts.

“Progressives have done a very good job making the moral case for Medicare for all,” said Representative Ro Khanna, Democrat of California. “What we now need to do is make the economic case.”

But with Republicans in charge of the White House and the Senate, the centrists argue that Congress needs to start with more incremental initiatives that could be slipped into larger bills, such as restoring money to enroll people in health plans on the Affordable Care Act’s exchanges. Other bills have bipartisan support; a measure drafted by Senator Susan Collins, Republican of Maine, would create state-based reinsurance programs to help pay large health insurance claims, thus lowering premiums on the act’s exchanges.

“After years of damage done to the A.C.A. from past Republican Congresses and the administration, we must start by reversing the sabotage,” leaders of the New Democrat Coalition wrote in a letter to the chairmen of three House committees responsible for health legislation.

Ms. Pelosi has publicly stayed out of the fight, but with hearings on Medicare for all and other proposals scheduled in the coming weeks, that stance may not be sustainable.'>>>

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/18/us/politics/democrats-health-care-medicare-for-all.html?

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democrats Pledged to Lower Health Costs. They Just Haven't Figured Out How. (Original Post) elleng Mar 2019 OP
"But with Republicans in charge of the White House and the Senate..." hedda_foil Mar 2019 #1
Drop the labels, recognize reality, and work at our goals. elleng Mar 2019 #3
I sure as hell hope that the party is already hard at work. Firestorm49 Mar 2019 #2
how about going after the corporatization of healthcare that made it so expensive in the first place crazycatlady Mar 2019 #4

hedda_foil

(16,375 posts)
1. "But with Republicans in charge of the White House and the Senate..."
Mon Mar 18, 2019, 01:26 PM
Mar 2019

Do these elected "centrists" expect this condition to remain beyond 2020? If so, they're DINO's, not Democrats. If not, the New Democrat Coalition have a point for now. But they should be expected to work hard to make sure the condition they describe does not continue past the 2020 election.

Firestorm49

(4,035 posts)
2. I sure as hell hope that the party is already hard at work.
Mon Mar 18, 2019, 01:26 PM
Mar 2019

We don't want to look like stupid Republicans and stand there with our thumbs up out butts saying things need to change, but having no solution whatsoever. The platform of the party needs to be well defined. The central issues need remedies, implementation concepts, PR follow up, and need to be set in stone now, not later. We will need to act with speed and efficiency. If a platform issue arises, we need to be ready with the paperwork, surveys, problems, solutions, and PR to educate the public about why we are doing something and what the benefits are. Success down the road should take into account how it is perceived by the public. Republicans hide all they can - "black" transparency. We need to get the public on our side by demonstrating leadership, knowledge of the issues, and how to remedy a problem.

crazycatlady

(4,492 posts)
4. how about going after the corporatization of healthcare that made it so expensive in the first place
Mon Mar 18, 2019, 08:10 PM
Mar 2019

Advertising costs, CEO corporate jets, shareholder dividends, etc.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Democrats Pledged to Lowe...