Mueller Team Finally Cracks Over William Barr's Letters
Weve learned, for example, that Barr rushed to exculpate President Donald Trump and his advisers in that four-page missive, which laid out what the attorney general claimed were the Mueller reports two key criminal inquiries: Conspiracy and obstruction of justice. Weve learned that, although Mueller felt his report didnt completely exonerate the president, he didnt think Trump and his team conspired with Russia to try sabotaging the 2016 presidential campaign. On the other hand, Mueller didnt decide whether Trump obstructed justice. Barr took that as a signal that he should rule on that one, and he did: No obstruction.
<snip>
The Post went further. It reported that members of Muellers team have complained to close associates that the evidence they gathered on obstruction was alarming and significant and much more acute than Barr suggested.
The Post quotes one anonymous U.S. official as saying that there was immediate displeasure from the team when they saw how the attorney general had characterized their work. This section from the Posts reporting about the Mueller teams summaries is telling:
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-04-04/mueller-team-has-had-enough-of-william-barr-s-letters
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)onetexan
(13,048 posts)A week or two too late.
ProfessorPlum
(11,262 posts)what the fuck are they waiting for? The cavalry? THEY are the cavalry.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)....doing a lot better than this mild har-rump.
Response to ProfessorPlum (Reply #3)
Ponietz This message was self-deleted by its author.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)co-conspirators as well for the cover up.
Lock them up!
Scarsdale
(9,426 posts)ready even before he received Mueller's report? How does one person peruse 400 pages so fast? Maybe one of tRump's lawyers wrote the summary? It is beyond time for the TRUTH to be exposed.
Harker
(14,028 posts)I'm pretty sure the full report did not come with CliffsNotes. Yes, that's how it's spelled now.
onetexan
(13,048 posts)and i'm wondering if Mueller is in cahoots with him as well (hoping this isn't the case but i do have my suspicions given the 2 are supposedly "buddies" .
Harker
(14,028 posts)Mueller hasn't struck me as the sort willing to throw away both his past and his future for a traitorous cabal.
Whatever the multifaceted truth is, I hope to live long enough to learn it. It promises to be as bizarre as anything Chuck Palahniuk has come up with to date.
Canoe52
(2,949 posts)calimary
(81,359 posts)And Kavanaugh and Pence. And ... meh, dont get me started...
JohnnyRingo
(18,638 posts)Depending on whether he's successful in burying the report, and even then he'll be known for building a wall around the Trump family. I doubt that's a legacy many in his position would want.
Botany
(70,539 posts)The report was prepared so that the front matter from each section could have been released immediately or very quickly, the official said. It was done in a way that minimum redactions, if any, would have been necessary, and the work would have spoken for itself.
Muellers team assumed the information was going to be made available to the public, the official said, and so they prepared their summaries to be shared in their own words and not in the attorney generals summary of their work, as turned out to be the case.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/limited-information-barr-has-shared-about-russia-investigation-frustrated-some-on-muellers-team/2019/04/03/c98e8a02-567a-11e9-814f-e2f46684196e_story.html?utm_term=.884c6a41b03c
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)going on about obstruction or conspiring or aiding/abetting a hostile foreign power, it was the team's duty to say so. So if they did not indict or recommend indicting, or find that any member of the Trump family was legally guilty of those things, it's their fault for not saying so, isn't it?
It's one thing to say they legally were guilty of this and that, and here's a mountain of evidence supporting that determination, and for Barr to leave that out. It's another for the Special Counsel to say they did not conspire or aid/abet, and oh by the way, here's the evidence we reviewed that led us to that conclusion...and Barr left out the reference to the evidence.
I am surprised that the Special Counsel did not at least recommend something, one way or the other, or definitively conclude something, except that "they're free & clear, unless you guys want to do something on your own and look at the evidence yourselves."
I'm sure Mueller will clear this up with his testimony before Congress. I hope it's soon.
Dopers_Greed
(2,640 posts)ProfessorPlum
(11,262 posts)is still getting its boots on. Did these experienced prosecutors not foresee this?
Arkansas Granny
(31,522 posts)Link to tweet
?s=20
Donald J. Trump
✔
@realDonaldTrump
The New York Times had no legitimate sources, which would be totally illegal, concerning the Mueller Report. In fact, they probably had no sources at all! They are a Fake News paper who have already been forced to apologize for their incorrect and very bad reporting on me!
18.6K
10:04 AM - Apr 4, 2019
watoos
(7,142 posts)A House committee needs ASAP to invite Mueller and Barr to testify in public. I expect Mueller to accept but if Barr declines that will be telling. Regardless, then Barr needs to be subpoenaed.
Barr and Mueller need to testify at the same hearing. Do it someone.