Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

appalachiablue

(41,124 posts)
Sun Sep 29, 2019, 10:02 PM Sep 2019

Federal Govt. Might Ask Protesters To Repay Security Costs of Demonstrations

As increasingly large and frequent protests have flooded Washington, D.C.'s streets in recent years, federal officials have searched for ways to offset the cost of supporting such demonstrations. Washington Post, Sept. 29, 2019.

The National Park Service last year floated a proposal that would alter protest regulations and require organizers to repay the federal government for the security costs. Earlier this month, Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.) announced he was crafting legislation to hold protesters arrested during unpermitted demonstrations liable “for police overtime and other fees related to the action.”
Putting organizers on the hook for the costs of policing could mean invoices in the tens of thousands of dollars, according to U.S. Park Police budgets obtained by The Washington Post through the Freedom of Information Act. That’s enough to price most activists out of protesting altogether, according to experts and activists awaiting a decision from the Park Service.

“If someone called me to say ‘I want to have a protest’ and I said, ‘Cool, the Park Service is going to charge you $150,000 for security,’ they would hang up the phone,” said Samantha Miller, an organizer with D.C. Action Lab, a company that helps out-of-towners plan and organize demonstrations in Washington. “There are already a lot of preexisting fees that organizers get asked to pay. Add in something like a security fee, and there’s just no way most people or organizations would be able to afford it.”

To obtain a permit for a protest in the District, organizers typically are required to provide a number of amenities to demonstrators, most of which cost money, Miller said. They include, but are not limited to, toilets, medical tents, cooling stations for hot days and audiovisual equipment for large demonstrations.
For a protest like the People’s Climate March — a rally in which tens of thousands of people marched from the Capitol to the White House — groups already can expect to stare down a budget of more than $100,000, Miller said. “You already need to have a certain amount of access to funds to try to get a permit for a certain size protest,” Miller said. “That’s already a huge burden.” ...
More, http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/the-government-might-ask-activists-to-repay-the-costs-of-securing-protests-experts-say-it-could-price-them-out/ar-AAHZnQh?ocid=HPCOMMDHP15

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal Govt. Might Ask Protesters To Repay Security Costs of Demonstrations (Original Post) appalachiablue Sep 2019 OP
Sounds a bit unconstitutional to me. The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2019 #1
They'll try esp. since money means all to many in charge. It would appalachiablue Sep 2019 #2
The government *chooses* to spend that money on cops and such. That is on them. RockRaven Sep 2019 #3
If the president doesn't pay his security bills for all his rallies GemDigger Sep 2019 #4
A-fricking-men! Nt raccoon Sep 2019 #7
You beat me to it. Delmette2.0 Sep 2019 #8
Yes they have. Chose your article from this google search. GemDigger Sep 2019 #9
Wow, Thank you. Delmette2.0 Sep 2019 #10
A Tax on Dissent amb123 Sep 2019 #5
When Trump pays for his rallies Buzz cook Sep 2019 #6

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,673 posts)
1. Sounds a bit unconstitutional to me.
Sun Sep 29, 2019, 10:08 PM
Sep 2019

Which part of "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances" don't they understand?

RockRaven

(14,958 posts)
3. The government *chooses* to spend that money on cops and such. That is on them.
Sun Sep 29, 2019, 10:27 PM
Sep 2019

That is NOT the protestors fault or responsibility. They have the right "peaceably to assemble and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

If the government wants to levy fines against parties whose actions are not peaceable, that is a totally separate and potentially legitimate matter. But that would occur AFTER the fact, in specific cases, in accordance with laws against the un-peaceable behavior in question. Prospectively fining everyone exercising their rights, across the board, for the government's heavy-handed response to Constitutionally protected behavior? FUCK OFF.

Delmette2.0

(4,164 posts)
8. You beat me to it.
Mon Sep 30, 2019, 12:14 PM
Sep 2019

Has any one ever tallied up how much his campaigns have cost local law enforcements across our country?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Federal Govt. Might Ask P...