Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Understanding the Right's Fear of Sex: How America's Absurd Oral Sex and Sodomy Laws Were Overturned
http://www.alternet.org/sex/154847/understanding_the_right%27s_fear_of_sex%3A_how_america%27s_absurd_oral_sex_and_sodomy_laws_were_overturned/It might seem utterly absurd that oral sex was once illegal in the U.S.as it was in every state before 1961. Until a landmark Supreme Court decision in 2003, though, it remained illegal in 13 states, along with anal sex (and in some, sex-toy use). Nine states banned it for everyone, and four restricted their laws to gays and lesbians. Though the laws were rarely enforced, they indelibly defined gay men and lesbians as criminals, and thus were used to justify discrimination. In 1991, Georgia Attorney General Michael Bowers cited the states sodomy law when rescinding a job offer to a recent law-school graduate after he found out she was a lesbian.
That Court decision, Lawrence v. Texas, still reverberates today. For the Christian right, it ranks with Roe v. Wade as the most odious Supreme Court ruling of all time. When right-wingers fume about activist judges creating rights not enumerated in the Constitution, they usually mean privacyspecifically, sexual privacy.
To more rational souls, the decisions logic is screamingly obvious. What could be a more unconstitutionally unreasonable search than cops battering into your bedroom to bust you for performing commonplace sex acts?
Yet the concept of a constitutional right to privacy has only become part of American jurisprudence in the last century, based on the idea that it is implicit in the "penumbra" of the Fourth Amendment. The Supreme Court extended privacy rights to sexuality in the 1965 Griswold v. Connecticut decision, which overturned a law prohibiting married couples from buying contraceptives, and to unmarried couples in 1972. Griswold was the precedent for legalizing abortion in 1973.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1885 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Understanding the Right's Fear of Sex: How America's Absurd Oral Sex and Sodomy Laws Were Overturned (Original Post)
xchrom
Apr 2012
OP
damyank913
(787 posts)1. Man, oh man...
...that was hard to swallow.
TrogL
(32,822 posts)5. You need to work on your technique
Just relax your jaw and .... wait, what?
DCKit
(18,541 posts)2. What's a "penumbra"? Sounds dirty. I wanna try it. nt
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)4. Non total shadow.
Umbra is shadow in Latin. Pen means "around".
Penumbra is a lighter shadow, as in astronomy when you have complete shadows and partial shadows during eclipses.
Peninsula -- Pen is around, insula is island. So it's almost an island.
Penumbra is a legal term in reference to rights of privacy.
sarge43
(28,945 posts)3. The federal government still enforces an oral/sodomy law, re UCMJ, Article 125. n/t