Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Agencies Can Launch Retaliatory Investigations Into Whistleblowers, Court Rules
Hat tip, a coworker, who emailed me with a link to this article.
Management
Agencies Can Launch Retaliatory Investigations Into Whistleblowers, Court Rules
Ruling sets a new governmentwide precedent.
April 13, 2020 05:10 PM ET
Eric Katz
Senior Correspondent
Federal agencies can launch retaliatory investigations against employees who blow the whistle on wrongdoing without violating anti-reprisal laws, a federal court has said in a precedent-setting ruling.
While agencies cannot dock pay, deny promotions or engage in several other retaliatory personnel actions against whistleblowers, investigating a worker who has attempted to shed a light on inappropriate or illegal behavior is allowable, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit said. Federal whistleblowers have long complained agencies seek to turn the tables on them in an effort to discredit their claims or remove them from their positions.
The case involved Leonard Sistek, who served as a director at a VA facility in Denver. Sistek made multiple disclosures to the VA inspector general protected under whistleblower law, raising concerns about agency spending and contractual anomalies. In 2014, Sistek was interviewed by an Administrative Investigation Board examining inappropriate office relationships, during which he realized he was himself subject to an investigation. He notified the IG that he suspected this was in retaliation for his whistleblowing. Later that year, the board cited Sistek for failing to report that a colleague had an inappropriate sexual relationship with the colleagues subordinate, and VA issued a letter of reprimand.
In early 2015, VA rescinded Sisteks letter and struck it from his record. Later that year, the IG validated two of his claims of department wrongdoing.
Sistek brought a case before the Merit Systems Protection Board, arguing that VA retaliated against him for blowing the whistle. An MSPB administrative judge, however, ruled in VAs favor, leading him to appeal the decision in the federal circuit court.
To qualify for relief under whistleblower law, employees must demonstrate their agency took a qualifying personnel action such as a denial of an appointment, a pay decision or another "significant change" in duties or working conditions. The MSPB judge ruled, and the appeals court subsequently affirmed, that a retaliatory investigation, in and of itself, does not qualify as a personnel action eligible for corrective action under the Whistleblower Protection Act. The court stated further that Congress "acted purposely in excluding retaliatory investigations" from prohibited behavior under the law.
{snip}
Agencies Can Launch Retaliatory Investigations Into Whistleblowers, Court Rules
Ruling sets a new governmentwide precedent.
April 13, 2020 05:10 PM ET
Eric Katz
Senior Correspondent
Federal agencies can launch retaliatory investigations against employees who blow the whistle on wrongdoing without violating anti-reprisal laws, a federal court has said in a precedent-setting ruling.
While agencies cannot dock pay, deny promotions or engage in several other retaliatory personnel actions against whistleblowers, investigating a worker who has attempted to shed a light on inappropriate or illegal behavior is allowable, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit said. Federal whistleblowers have long complained agencies seek to turn the tables on them in an effort to discredit their claims or remove them from their positions.
The case involved Leonard Sistek, who served as a director at a VA facility in Denver. Sistek made multiple disclosures to the VA inspector general protected under whistleblower law, raising concerns about agency spending and contractual anomalies. In 2014, Sistek was interviewed by an Administrative Investigation Board examining inappropriate office relationships, during which he realized he was himself subject to an investigation. He notified the IG that he suspected this was in retaliation for his whistleblowing. Later that year, the board cited Sistek for failing to report that a colleague had an inappropriate sexual relationship with the colleagues subordinate, and VA issued a letter of reprimand.
In early 2015, VA rescinded Sisteks letter and struck it from his record. Later that year, the IG validated two of his claims of department wrongdoing.
Sistek brought a case before the Merit Systems Protection Board, arguing that VA retaliated against him for blowing the whistle. An MSPB administrative judge, however, ruled in VAs favor, leading him to appeal the decision in the federal circuit court.
To qualify for relief under whistleblower law, employees must demonstrate their agency took a qualifying personnel action such as a denial of an appointment, a pay decision or another "significant change" in duties or working conditions. The MSPB judge ruled, and the appeals court subsequently affirmed, that a retaliatory investigation, in and of itself, does not qualify as a personnel action eligible for corrective action under the Whistleblower Protection Act. The court stated further that Congress "acted purposely in excluding retaliatory investigations" from prohibited behavior under the law.
{snip}
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1047 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Agencies Can Launch Retaliatory Investigations Into Whistleblowers, Court Rules (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2020
OP
Wednesdays
(17,380 posts)1. We're now living in the tRump-Barr justice system
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)2. This needs to be challenged at SCROTUS, after we pack it with sane people.
BeckyDem
(8,361 posts)4. +1. We have to.
BeckyDem
(8,361 posts)3. omfg
Fuck authoritarians.
wkdjr
(5 posts)5. we must turn their slime on them
In Jan next year we must turn this on the supreme court by starting
an investigation on them for their financial and political entanglements, show their hypocrisy.