Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,034 posts)
Sat Jan 16, 2021, 02:17 AM Jan 2021

A former president Trump won't 'need to know.' Cut off his intelligence.

Every former president in the modern era has benefited from a unique national security perk after leaving the White House: routine intelligence briefings and access to classified information to support his continued involvement in advancing America’s interests. These briefings have been a matter of respectful convention and were granted by the new president to the old.

But convention left the premises a long time ago with President Trump, and his demonstrated approach to national security and intelligence suggest that a more purposeful decision must be made about providing intelligence to this soon-to-be former president.

My recommendation, as a 30-plus-year veteran of the intelligence community, is not to provide him any briefings after Jan. 20. With this simple act — which is solely the new president’s prerogative — Joe Biden can mitigate one aspect of the potential national security risk posed by Donald Trump, private citizen.

For four years, as president, he has received — or had opportunity to receive — every single piece of information and analysis that the intelligence community produced, regardless of compartment or classification. It is hard to overstate the value of what he has read and heard.

His post-White House “security profile,” as the professionals like to call it, is daunting. Any former president is by definition a target and presents some risks. But a former president Trump, even before the events of last week, might be unusually vulnerable to bad actors with ill intent. He leaves, unlike his predecessors who embraced the muted responsibilities of being a “former,” with a stated agenda to stay engaged in politics and policy. No departing president in the modern era has hinted at or planned on becoming a political actor immediately after leaving office.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/sue-gordon-trump-intelligence-briefings-former-president/2021/01/15/94b15c72-5747-11eb-a817-e5e7f8a406d6_story.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A former president Trump won't 'need to know.' Cut off his intelligence. (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jan 2021 OP
Love the sound of "former president Trump" riversedge Jan 2021 #1
I'd like to see him forfeit all of his perquisites. Harker Jan 2021 #2
I definitely vote for this and I expect Biden will too. Not that he supposedly paid any attention dutch777 Jan 2021 #3
An income source. Jared thinks that a security clearance is a license to sell our country's secrets. keithbvadu2 Jan 2021 #4
Agree with this. Cut him off . JI7 Jan 2021 #5
The briefings are not a perk or courtesy. Thunderbeast Jan 2021 #6
Oh, hell no packman Jan 2021 #7

riversedge

(70,242 posts)
1. Love the sound of "former president Trump"
Sat Jan 16, 2021, 02:26 AM
Jan 2021



........His post-White House “security profile,” as the professionals like to call it, is daunting. Any former president is by definition a target and presents some risks. But a former president Trump, even before the events of last week, might be unusually vulnerable to bad actors with ill intent. He leaves, unlike his predecessors who embraced the muted responsibilities of being a “former,” with a stated agenda to stay engaged in politics and policy. No departing president in the modern era has hinted at or planned on becoming a political actor immediately after leaving office.

Harker

(14,024 posts)
2. I'd like to see him forfeit all of his perquisites.
Sat Jan 16, 2021, 02:58 AM
Jan 2021

Pension, travel allowance, secret service protection... everything.

Unlikely, but it's a happy thought.

dutch777

(3,023 posts)
3. I definitely vote for this and I expect Biden will too. Not that he supposedly paid any attention
Sat Jan 16, 2021, 03:16 AM
Jan 2021

...when he was in office. But now he can monetize it or just be a f**k up and blab about what he knows to impress the minions.

keithbvadu2

(36,829 posts)
4. An income source. Jared thinks that a security clearance is a license to sell our country's secrets.
Sat Jan 16, 2021, 04:51 AM
Jan 2021

An income source.

Thunderbeast

(3,417 posts)
6. The briefings are not a perk or courtesy.
Sat Jan 16, 2021, 10:24 AM
Jan 2021

They have historically been used to share experience that can benefit the CURRENT President. The briefings help administrations understand context of current events and avoid repeating mistakes and learn about successful strategies.

The outgoing President (45) has little or nothing to offer any future administration of value to the nation. His lack of curiosity and impulsive, self-centered approach to the duties of the office disqualify him for holding a seat, however ceremonial, at the table.

 

packman

(16,296 posts)
7. Oh, hell no
Sat Jan 16, 2021, 11:12 AM
Jan 2021

Even though the idiot needs all the intelligence he can get- he would sell out secrets/intel for his own interests

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»A former president Trump ...