Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Scholar Carol Anderson on the "anti-Blackness" coded into the Second Amendment
Scholar Carol Anderson on the "anti-Blackness" coded into the Second Amendment
Behind the Second Amendment's ambiguous language, Anderson says, is a white terror that endures to this day
By DEAN OBEIDALLAH
PUBLISHED JULY 12, 2021 5:30AM
(Salon) Carol Anderson is likely to trigger a lot of people on the right with her book about the anti-Black history of the Second Amendment, "The Second: Race and Guns in a Fatally Unequal America." But if anyone understands what white backlash looks and feels like it's Anderson, who also wrote the 2016 bestseller "White Rage."
In her new book, Anderson, the chair of African American studies at Emory University, shares a history of the Second Amendment that few of us ever heard, arguing that it was included in the U.S. Constitution after demands by slave states for a constitutional right to form militias to put down slave revolts. Anderson details how Virginia's Patrick Henry and George Mason expressed fears that the federal government would not help them defeat slave uprisings, and demanded that the Second Amendment be included so they could deal with such revolts themselves an acute concern in the slave-owning oligarchy of that time.
From there, Anderson traces how for decades the Second Amendment only protected the right of white Americans to own guns. In fact, states like Virginia enacted laws in the early 1800's making it a crime for free Black people to carry guns. In the infamous 1857 Dred Scott decision, where the Supreme Court ruled that Black people were not citizens, Chief Justice Roger Taney who wrote the opinion expressed the concern that if Blacks were to become citizens, they would have the constitutional right to firearms
Anderson draws a straight line from the racist history of the Second Amendment and its application to our society today where armed (and unarmed) Black Americans are treated vastly different by the police than armed and dangerous white people. She points to the contrast between the case of 12-year-old Tamir Rice, who in 2014 was killed by police while playing with a toy pellet gun, andwhite supremacist Dylann Roof, who in 2015 murdered nine Black worshipers at a historic church in South Carolina, but was captured alive by police. ..................(more)
https://www.salon.com/2021/07/12/scholar-carol-anderson-on-the-anti-blackness-coded-into-the-second-amendment/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1071 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Scholar Carol Anderson on the "anti-Blackness" coded into the Second Amendment (Original Post)
marmar
Jul 2021
OP
Not far from the truth today-- The majority of 2nd Amendment gun-humpers are racists.
Hoyt
Jul 2021
#1
and now the gun idolators swear the NRA has been instrumental in freeing black folks...
Thomas Hurt
Jul 2021
#3
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)1. Not far from the truth today-- The majority of 2nd Amendment gun-humpers are racists.
mopinko
(70,135 posts)2. unrestrained id.
operating out of fear. totally lizard brained.
we must evolve and soon.
Thomas Hurt
(13,903 posts)3. and now the gun idolators swear the NRA has been instrumental in freeing black folks...
by ensuring they could own guns.
hack89
(39,171 posts)4. So why did every non-slave state add the right to bear arms to their state consitutions?
the slave states were going to violently suppress slave revolts regardless of the 2A. They were going to deprive AA of their civil liberties regardless of the Bill of Rights.
This may have been a factor in the 2A but it not the only or the largest. In New England, King Philips war was a larger factor than potential slave revolts in far away southern states - the need for armed citizen militias to defend hearth and home was a recent and bitter memory.