Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,319 posts)
Sun Sep 12, 2021, 11:08 AM Sep 2021

The story of the Scalia clerk who quietly became a legal mastermind

Last edited Tue Apr 5, 2022, 02:35 PM - Edit history (2)

Dave Weigel Retweeted

NEW: The story of Scalia clerk who quietly became legal mastermind behind Texas abortion law. Our reporting found he explicitly wrote the law so it could survive regardless of what court did. His efforts to flummox court date to ‘13 when he 1st tried this.



Behind the Texas Abortion Law, a Persevering Conservative Lawyer

Jonathan F. Mitchell
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The story of the Scalia clerk who quietly became a legal mastermind (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2021 OP
In law school, specifically my orientation and legal procedure, no_hypocrisy Sep 2021 #1
From Virginia Law Review, 2018: The Writ-of-Erasure Fallacy mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2021 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2021 #3
Here's some biographical information about him. mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2021 #4
So, an educated white male writes the legal framework... The Unmitigated Gall Sep 2021 #5

no_hypocrisy

(46,038 posts)
1. In law school, specifically my orientation and legal procedure,
Sun Sep 12, 2021, 11:28 AM
Sep 2021

it was stressed that one could de-construct The Law as well as bolster it.

This is an example of the former. Hitler's attorneys did something similar as well as replacing its judicial system with lackey judges.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,319 posts)
2. From Virginia Law Review, 2018: The Writ-of-Erasure Fallacy
Sun Sep 12, 2021, 11:36 AM
Sep 2021
Behind Texas Abortion Law, an Attorney’s Unusual Enforcement Idea

Jonathan F. Mitchell taught law and clerked for Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia before devising a provision that has confounded abortion-rights advocates and animated their opponents

By Jacob Gershman
https://twitter.com/jacobgershman
jacob.gershman@wsj.com
Sept. 4, 2021 9:38 am ET

Behind a Texas law that has confounded legal scholars and given abortion opponents hope is a publicity-shy, 45-year-old West Coast litigator known for his command of abstruse legal theory.

The Texas Heartbeat Act has survived a brush with the Supreme Court and made Texas the most restrictive in the nation for abortion access, thanks largely to its unusual enforcement scheme. The law puts ordinary Texans—not any government official—in charge of enforcing a prohibition on performing or aiding abortions after six weeks of pregnancy, making it more difficult to challenge in court.

TO READ THE FULL STORY
SUBSCRIBE
SIGN IN

Here's where he described what he had in mind.

.pdf: The Writ-of-Erasure Fallacy

.html: The Writ-Of-Erasure Fallacy

Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Reply #2)

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The story of the Scalia c...