Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,234 posts)
Mon Dec 13, 2021, 02:46 PM Dec 2021

Editorial: What we spend: The Defense Authorization Act, 'Build Back Better' and American priorities

It’s not often that the end of something means you spend even more money on it, but U.S. defense spending has long defied most rational parameters. With the United States formally out of wars for the first time in about two decades, the Pentagon’s budget increased 5% over last year to a staggering $768 billion in the annual National Defense Authorization Act alone, with an additional $10 billion in non-NDAA defense spending. The package was passed by the House and is expected to pass the Senate.

While lawmakers spent months in protracted negotiations whittling down the infrastructure package and President Joe Biden’s social spending bill, there was no such inhibition when it came to the defense package, with legislators tossing in $25 billion more than what Biden had requested. Despite being a spending measure of roughly half the size of the controversial infrastructure bill in just one year, it is remarkably difficult to find much robust public conversation about what its components even are.

We’re not peaceniks. We support a robust, state-of-the-art military. Still, it should give politicians ostensibly worried about spending pause that a total of $28 billion is going to some 400 land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles. There is lots more money for tanks, armored vehicles, small arms and all sorts of other implements mainly useful for ground invasions of the type we just ended. Again: Some of the weapons systems and programs are worthwhile, and others are not, but it’s unconscionable that policymakers barely feel the need to justify this fire hose of public dollars.

Meantime, one thing that is missing from the massive bill is a provision to move the investigation of serious crimes within the armed forces, including sexual assault, out of the chain of command and into the hands of trained and impartial military prosecutors. That important measure backed by New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand failed despite the backing of bipartisan majorities in both houses of Congress. It seems like there’s plenty of money, but not so much room for justice.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/editorial-what-we-spend-the-defense-authorization-act-build-back-better-and-american-priorities/ar-AARLnsT

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Editorial: What we spend: The Defense Authorization Act, 'Build Back Better' and American priorities (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 2021 OP
And what about our hospitals? CrispyQ Dec 2021 #1
This is what the end of empire looks like MsLeopard Dec 2021 #2
Eisenhower warned against the military-industrial complex nitpicker Dec 2021 #3

MsLeopard

(1,265 posts)
2. This is what the end of empire looks like
Mon Dec 13, 2021, 03:56 PM
Dec 2021

The war profiteers running off with all they can get their hands on, while the right wing does all it can to end democracy for the sake of eternal minority rule. Is it too early for wine?

nitpicker

(7,153 posts)
3. Eisenhower warned against the military-industrial complex
Mon Dec 13, 2021, 04:18 PM
Dec 2021

Just about since I've been alive, the pork barrel for almost every district has spread.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Editorial: What we spend:...