Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,234 posts)
Tue Feb 22, 2022, 10:45 PM Feb 2022

Enough shocking stories about Ginni Thomas. It's time for some action

The biggest threat to the legitimacy of the United States Supreme Court is not its potential expansion, nor even what seems to be a likely reversal of Roe v. Wade in what would be a devastating scaling-back of women's rights.

It's Ginni and Clarence Thomas.

Virginia "Ginni" Thomas, who is married to Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas, has become an increasingly visible and increasingly radical far-right activist at the same time that her husband has pushed Supreme Court jurisprudence far to the right. Clarence Thomas has crossed a whole series of ethical lines related to his wife's work, and it's far past time for Congress to act. We need a basic ethics law that sets out transparency rules for organizations that file amicus briefs to the Supreme Court, and standards for recusal among Supreme Court justices.

Ginni Thomas works directly with organizations that are taking cases to the Supreme Court -- cases that will be heard and decided by her husband. In a groundbreaking story published earlier this year, the New Yorker's Jane Mayer detailed the many ways in which Thomas is heavily involved with a number of cases heading to or already heard before the Supreme Court. She is tied to groups that have written amicus briefs supporting the conservative side of Supreme Court cases on everything from immigration to abortion rights to affirmative action. In some cases, she serves on a group's advisory board. In others, her consulting group has been paid by the same people whose names appear on amicus briefs filed with the Court. And in others, partners in one of her advocacy organizations have petitioned the Court or filed amicus briefs before it on a variety of matters.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/opinion-enough-shocking-stories-about-ginni-thomas-it-s-time-for-some-action/ar-AAUbjWb

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Enough shocking stories about Ginni Thomas. It's time for some action (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 2022 OP
It's been known for years ampm Feb 2022 #1
Anthony Weiner was posed to go after them before he got caught up in his own mess Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 2022 #2
Every time you type Ginni Thomas, link her name to my page on her on RW-Infopedia ck4829 Feb 2022 #3
This will not happen anytime soon: maxsolomon Feb 2022 #4

ampm

(302 posts)
1. It's been known for years
Wed Feb 23, 2022, 12:37 PM
Feb 2022

Just because it's making headlines now, is really troubling. They can do whatever they want in the court they have a majority and can run us into the ground. The federalists dream come true.

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,234 posts)
2. Anthony Weiner was posed to go after them before he got caught up in his own mess
Wed Feb 23, 2022, 01:44 PM
Feb 2022

Ah what could've been.

maxsolomon

(33,400 posts)
4. This will not happen anytime soon:
Wed Feb 23, 2022, 04:56 PM
Feb 2022
We need a basic ethics law that sets out transparency rules for organizations that file amicus briefs to the Supreme Court, and standards for recusal among Supreme Court justices.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Enough shocking stories a...