Opinion: The Supreme Court gets a taste of its own medicine - Milbank
Last week, on the very day President Biden announced his nomination of Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court, Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) issued a statement expressing his earnest concern that Judge Jackson was the favored choice of far-left dark-money groups. On Tuesday, McConnell repeated on the Senate floor that he is troubled by the intensity of Judge Jacksons far-left dark-money fan club.
Even for McConnell, a five-time Olympic gold medalist in hypocrisy, this was special. There is perhaps no human being more responsible for the tsunami of unlimited, unregulated dark money that has corrupted and consumed American politics than Addison Mitchell McConnell III. Nobody worked harder to thwart campaign finance limits and to block the disclosure of contributors names. One Nation, the dark-money group McConnell effectively controls with his former chief of staff at the helm, raised more than $172 million in 2020, according to a tax return obtained by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.
(snip)
Still, its refreshing to hear McConnell and the right complain about dark money distorting Supreme Court nominations. Therein lies a case of rough justice. Its difficult to overstate the extent to which the Supreme Courts 2010 ruling in Citizens United and subsequent decisions have distorted and corrupted politics. So its only fitting that the distortion reaches into the high court, too. Just as unregulated, anonymous billions have elected extremists and rewarded intransigence, dark money is making sure that future court nominees are vetted and approved by unknown donors rather than through the advice and consent of the Senate.
(snip)
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), for his part, says Jacksons nomination to the Supreme Court means the radical left has won President Biden over yet again. Those making the radical left claim against Jackson (the Republican National Committee calls her a radical, left-wing activist) point to her ruling against the Trump administrations claim that it could ignore subpoenas, when she dared to write that presidents are not kings. But Graham makes the radical left claim even though he voted to confirm Jackson to the appellate court. The radical left charge is also rebutted by endorsements of her by retired conservative judges J. Michael Luttig and Thomas B. Griffith, and by William Burck, a lawyer for Trump White House officials. Others are preparing to allege that Jacksons nomination will be steamrolled through the Senate. John Barrasso (Wyo.), the No. 3 Senate GOP leader, said the country cannot afford for this process to be rushed. McConnell wants an exhaustive review. Their newfound patience comes after confirming Amy Coney Barrett a mere 30 days after Trump nominated her and a week before the 2020 election.
More..
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/03/02/ketanji-brown-jackson-dark-money-hypocrisy
JudyM
(29,251 posts)redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)RockCreek
(739 posts)That they repotedly sold on Feb 23, 2022.
www.courier-journal.com/story/news/education/2022/03/04/amid-russia-invading-ukraine-kentucky-teachers-pension-system-caught-middle/9373911002/