Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

appalachiablue

(41,153 posts)
Mon Apr 25, 2022, 12:40 AM Apr 2022

Less Advocacy, More Journalism. Changes at CNN, New York Times May Signal Push To The Center

- The Guardian, April 24, 2022. - Cable company’s demise comes a month after launching as mainstream media tackle bleed-through of opinion into news.'

The highest echelons of the US media were once again in the spotlight this week, after CNN this week abandoned a newly launched streaming service and the New York Times appointed a prominent Bostonian to lead it. CNN+ will shut down on 30 April, about a month after it was launched with a $300m investment. The new owner of the network, Warner Bros Discovery – itself the product of a $43bn merger between AT&T and the Discovery Network – decided a subscription-based streaming service was unfeasible. Only 100,000 users had signed up.

The new chairman and chief executive of CNN, Chris Licht, said the decision to dump CNN+ was the product of a uniquely bad situation. “We have to own what happened, even though it’s not a result of what we did,” Licht told employees at a town hall meeting. The shelving of the service leaves in the lurch high-profile hires including the veteran Fox News journalist Chris Wallace and Kasie Hunt, formerly of NBC News and MSNBC. It is also the end of a project that encouraged top CNN reporters toward less news-focused fare such as Jake Tapper’s Book Club and Parental Guidance With Anderson Cooper.

At an Oprah Winfrey-hosted company meeting on the Warner Bros lot in Burbank, California last week, David Zaslav, chief executive and president of CNN’s corporate parent, reportedly said he wanted CNN to focus on the facts and set itself apart from a cable-news industry monopolised by “advocacy networks”. “If we get that, we can have a civilized society,” Zaslav reportedly said. “And without it, if it all becomes advocacy, we don’t have a civilized society.”

A board member, John Malone, has also spoken on the subject of media bias. “I would like to see CNN evolve back to the kind of journalism that it started with and actually have journalists, which would be unique and refreshing,” Malone told CNBC in November. CNN is not alone in signaling that it is abandoning a kind of reporting that arguably came to pass in an effort to counter Fox News, the far more profitable rightwing outlet known for intense audience loyalty. Addressing the bleed-through of opinion into news has also been on the menu at the New York Times, though less overtly so given the gift that would present to the paper’s enemies. This week, the controlling Sulzberger family tapped Joe Kahn, a former China correspondent, to be the new executive editor...

- More, https://www.theguardian.com/media/2022/apr/24/cnn-new-york-times-us-media

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Less Advocacy, More Journalism. Changes at CNN, New York Times May Signal Push To The Center (Original Post) appalachiablue Apr 2022 OP
So CNN may go back to elementary school and start over again? DURHAM D Apr 2022 #1
I don't know what they're trying to do, strange. appalachiablue Apr 2022 #2
Straight up Rebl2 Apr 2022 #8
I hope this means news. Facts. Not so much opinions and talking heads. And.. Deuxcents Apr 2022 #3
How would Olberman fit into that? tirebiter Apr 2022 #4
I don't Rebl2 Apr 2022 #9
Can anyone interpret this for me. A lot of hieroglyphics. KPN Apr 2022 #5
As long as the journalism doesn't devolve into both-siderism. Beartracks Apr 2022 #6
That's nice. Sherman A1 Apr 2022 #7

DURHAM D

(32,610 posts)
1. So CNN may go back to elementary school and start over again?
Mon Apr 25, 2022, 12:46 AM
Apr 2022

Too bad they are such slow learners. Might be too late.

Deuxcents

(16,263 posts)
3. I hope this means news. Facts. Not so much opinions and talking heads. And..
Mon Apr 25, 2022, 01:02 AM
Apr 2022

When they do have guests..let them do the talking for more than a few seconds. Ask relevant questions n dig deep into the issues. Imo, of course

Rebl2

(13,529 posts)
9. I don't
Mon Apr 25, 2022, 10:09 AM
Apr 2022

see him fitting into that at all. Very opinionated in my view, unless he is going to do sports. Of course he probably has opinions on sports as well.

Beartracks

(12,816 posts)
6. As long as the journalism doesn't devolve into both-siderism.
Mon Apr 25, 2022, 01:30 AM
Apr 2022

Because, frankly, facts have a liberal bias, and that's just a fact.

========

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
7. That's nice.
Mon Apr 25, 2022, 05:17 AM
Apr 2022

So they admit at least in principle somewhere that what they have been jokingly referring to as a news service is really just BS?

It will be a cold 🥶 day in hell before I bother with either of them again. There are simply too many sources for news and information available to worry about the likes of either of these providers of noise.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Less Advocacy, More Journ...