Texas' social media law is what real censorship looks like
The state of Texas wants to tell social media companies what user-generated content they can keep on their websites. In September 2021, Texas passed a law that prohibits the largest social media companies, such as Facebook and Twitter, from removing users or their posts based on political expressions or viewpoints (pdf). It also lets Texans sue social media companies with more than 50 million users under the law for any perceived violations.
Critics have blasted the law as unconstitutional for violating the First Amendment rights of private entities like Twitter to exercise control over speech on their platforms. Legal analysts also argue the Texas bill violates Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, a clause shielding internet companies from liability for moderating user-generated content.
In December, a federal district court judge in Texas issued a preliminary injunction (pdf) preventing the law from taking effect. The judge wrote that the laws prohibitions on censorship and constraints on how social media platforms disseminate content violate the First Amendment. But on May 11, a three-judge panel on a federal appeals court lifted the injunction letting the law stay on the books while the court considers the Texas governments appeal.
Scott Wilkens, a senior staff attorney with the Knight First Amendment Institute, said in a statement that the decision will have terrible consequences for online speech. Texass law violates the First Amendment because it compels social media companies to publish speech they dont want to publish, Wilkens wrote in a statement. Worse, the theory of the First Amendment that Texas is advancing in this case would give government broad power to censor and distort public discourse.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/followers-qanon-queen-canada-face-232436123.html
Phoenix61
(17,017 posts)Deuxcents
(16,314 posts)CrispyQ
(36,502 posts)This could get interesting.