The Political Religions That Brought Down Roe
The Political Religions That Brought Down Roe
5/19/2022 by Frederick Clarkson
Abortion activists gather outside of the Basilica of St. Patricks Old Cathedral, a Catholic church in downtown Manhattan, on May 7, 2022, while anti-abortion activists and worshippers look on. The protests and counter-protests have been occurring weekly, but have been given added urgency by the recent leaked Supreme Court ruling on Roe v. Wade. (Spencer Platt / Getty Images)
Since it has become clear that Roe v. Wade will be overturned, most of the commentary focused on the history of the law and the politics of the Supreme Court. But there is much more to the story. The Catholic Church has been the principal religious opponent to advances in birth control and abortion rights and access. But to achieve its goals, it needed allies in its long-term campaign of resistance. It took some time, but they found them. How conservative Christianity waged a half-century war on Roe will be the stuff of books and graduate theses. Here are some of the major themes that that they will contain.
Co-Belligerents
In the years before Roe, a tectonic cultural shift was well underway in the the bellwether institutions of mainline Protestantism, which had been at the center of American culture for centuries. Increasingly, they were joining most of Judaism to take pro-choice positions. For example, the United Church of Christ, the 20th century legacy of the Pilgrims (1971), The Episcopal Church (1967) and the Presbyterian Church (USA) (1970). At the time of the 1973 Roe decision, even the conservative Southern Baptist Convention was moderately pro-choice. In the 1980s, it was not uncommon to see a lone Catholic prelate, Cardinal John OConnor of New York, sitting uncomfortably on a stage with evangelical anti-abortion leaders. But things began to change thanks to the work of conservative evangelical theologian Francis Schaeffer, whose books, films and public campaigns helped galvanize much of evangelicalism into confrontation with the secular state on abortion. Schaeffer said that the situations that justified revolution against tyranny in the past are exactly what we are facing today. The whole structure of our society, he concluded, is being attacked and destroyed. But Schaeffer knew it would take an alliance with the Catholics to prevail, and so he crafted the idea of co-belligerency, which presumed it was necessary to set aside institutional imperatives and theological differences in order to cooperate on a shared political agenda.
. . . .
Randall Terry, the founder of Operation Rescue, who traveled the country organizing blockades of abortion clinics, said, You have to read Schaeffers Christian Manifesto if you want to understand Operation Rescue. After reading the contemporary theocratic thinkers known as Christian Reconstructionists, he wrote in his 1995 book, The Sword: The Blessing of Righteous Government and the Overthrow of Tyrants: I gladly confess that I want to see civic law in America (and every nation) restored to and based on the Law given by God to Moses on Mount Sinai. Terrys theological evolution epitomizes the sea change in evangelical theology and politics that has guided the maturation of the Christian right political movement in moving beyond protest to contesting for political and governmental power.
. . . . .
Wielding Power
Donald Trump promised the Christian right that lifted him to power that he would appoint justices who would overturn Roe. He kept his word. But he was quietly guided to the right choices in his judicial nominations by a troika of the kinds of people who quietly make things happen in Washington. What was unusual about Trumps troika was their relationships with each other and with the secretive, conservative Catholic organization, Opus Dei, where all three served on the board of its Washington headquarters, the Catholic Information Center (CIC)just two blocks from The White House. Opus Dei, which means the work of God in Latin, is a conservative, arguably fascistic (according to author Craig Unger) international Catholic organization that was founded during the reign of Spanish dictator Francisco Franco and became a global personal prelature by John Paul II.
Opus Deis Washington headquarters is the Catholic Information Center, or CIC. In October at its John Paul II New Evangelization Award Dinner, the organization will formally honor Leonard Leolongtime president of the Federalist Society who led campaigns in support of Supreme Court nominees John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. (CIC)
. . . . .
https://msmagazine.com/2022/05/19/abortion-catholic-church-opus-dei-evangelical-christianity-religion-roe-v-wade/
keithbvadu2
(36,869 posts)It is not faith nor belief. It is power and control.
We have quite a few religious despots who want to be the Christian Ayatollah of America.
What will they do when it is not their version of Christianity in charge?
niyad
(113,510 posts)OldBaldy1701E
(5,144 posts)No? Then stop trying to program people with that crap. It has not been overturned yet and until it has been, we need to stop doing their dirty work for them. Just my opinion.
niyad
(113,510 posts)in that article is incorrect?
OldBaldy1701E
(5,144 posts)And, maybe we should watch how we say things until it has been. (This does not mean we should not act to try and defend it, it means that it has not been overturned yet.) Also, I have rechecked the post and I did not say anything was 'incorrect'. I am still holding that it will not be overturned.
lees1975
(3,874 posts)I'm thinking that the political eruption which occurred when the brief was leaked scared Republicans spitless and points to their defeat in November and someone with some influence in the party got to Kavanaugh or Gorsuch and appealed to their own partisan biases.
But if you read the brief, there wasn't much room to wiggle on the margins.
OldBaldy1701E
(5,144 posts)I hope that it will not be overturned. I do not know anything other than the fact that if it is, I would also hope that every single female in the country would make sure to never allow a male to have sex with them again. Dare them to use force. Dare them to expose the fact that males will, by and large (which means a majority, not every single male on the planet), consider this insulting and an affront to their very ego. Dare them to prove that it is all about power and not about whatever cause of the day they spew. I would also dream that a massive majority of the states will keep their hands off of a females body and life and then the few Neanderthal governments left will haver no choice but to stop this lunacy.
I know... dreams. They are all some of us have left. Those of us that still can dream anyway.