Supreme Court climate decision backs capitalism without conscience
Several political commentators have speculated recently that neoliberalism is dead. Its not. That arguably soulless economic philosophy is evident in the new U.S. Supreme Court ruling that disarmed the federal governments best weapon against global climate change. The court ruled that without specific direction from Congress, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) cant regulate greenhouse gas pollution under the Clean Air Act.
Neoliberalism is a confusing term in the United States because we associate liberal with the political left. But in Europe, where modern neoliberalism was born shortly after World War II, the term refers to the philosophy that free-market competition, not government, should organize society. Neoliberals believe the governments only functions should be national defense and keeping markets unfettered.
To a neoliberal, corporate social responsibility is superfluous because a corporations only responsibility is to generate profits for its shareholders. Its a winner-take-all, capitalism without conscience and wealth without obligation ideology.
Influential capitalists in Europe revived neoliberalism after the Great Depression, worried that the success of Franklin Roosevelts New Deal would lead to socialism and even communism. The philosophy took root in the United States near the beginning of the 1980s, championed by President Ronald Reagan, who became the patron saint of conservatives when he said, Government is not a solution to our problem; government is the problem.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/supreme-court-climate-decision-backs-capitalism-without-conscience/ar-AAZekOo
elleng
(130,956 posts)laws/congress/presidents are not able to master the details necessary to establish rational rules.
'The court ruled that without specific direction from Congress, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) cant regulate greenhouse gas pollution under the Clean Air Act.'
Midnight Writer
(21,768 posts)We can't put limits on the freedoms of billionaires.
We can't put limits on the freedoms of gun owners.
We can't put limits on the freedoms of mega-churches.
Women, LGBTQ, POC, voters? Yeah, we need laws to keep them in their place.