Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,027 posts)
Tue Jun 26, 2012, 12:47 AM Jun 2012

How Republicans made it possible for the Supreme Court to rule against the mandate

Ezra Klein, Washington Post, 6/26/12

It wasn’t easy for Barack Obama to persuade David Axelrod to take him on as a client. It took years, actually. But there was a reason Obama wanted Axelrod to run his campaigns. Axelrod knew how to get black candidates elected by white voters. In fact, he had a whole theory about it.

In a 2008 profile of Axelrod in the New Republic, Jason Zengerle quoted Ken Snyder, a Democratic consultant and Axelrod protege, on his mentor’s approach. “David felt there almost had to be a permission structure set up for certain white voters to consider a black candidate.” The “permission structure” relied heavily on “third-party authentication“ — endorsements from respected figures or institutions that the targeted voters admired.

If you think back to the 2008 campaign, Axelrod was slowly building this permission structure around Obama. Right before Super Tuesday, Axelrod rolled out the endorsements of Ted and Caroline Kennedy. Right before the election, he rolled out Colin Powell. The timing and nature of the endorsements were meant to make an African American candidate with an international upbringing and the name Barack Hussein Obama into someone that Ohio steelworkers could feel comfortable voting for. If Ted Kennedy and Colin Powell can back this guy, so can you.

But permission structures aren’t just for elections. Over the past two years, the Republican Party has slowly been building a permission structure for the five Republicans on the Supreme Court to feel comfortable doing something nobody thought they could do: Violate the existing understanding of the commerce clause and, in perhaps the most significant moment of judicial activism since the New Deal, overturn either all or part of the Affordable Care Act.

full: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/how-republicans-made-it-possible-for-the-supreme-court-to-rule-against-the-mandate/2012/06/25/gJQA0wFw2V_singlePage.html

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How Republicans made it possible for the Supreme Court to rule against the mandate (Original Post) alp227 Jun 2012 OP
I was going to post that myself. A search showed that you did it first. mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2012 #1
Excellent article flamingdem Jun 2012 #2

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,484 posts)
1. I was going to post that myself. A search showed that you did it first.
Thu Jun 28, 2012, 09:11 AM
Jun 2012

I can't believe there's no reponse to this. Kick.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»How Republicans made it p...