Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
How a Fringe Legal Theory Became a Threat to Democracy
The Museum of the Albemarle, on the eastern shore of North Carolina, is a spacious building the color of sand and sea glass. Its in Elizabeth City, about as far from the Research Triangle as Baltimore is from New York City, but you can get there and back in the same day if you know how to drive fast without getting pulled over. There are a hundred counties in this state, and Ive spent time in every one, Sailor Jones, a democracy activist, told me this past fall, on his way to speak at the museum. He was a skillful multitaskersipping from a huge fountain Coke, tweaking a Rihanna-heavy playlist, and taking call after call on speakerphone, all while bombing his Toyota 4Runner down an empty stretch of highway bisecting a cotton farm. Jones is forty-eight, with sandy hair and a round face; he grew up in northeastern North Carolina, a rural, working-class part of the state. When I tell people I was born in a tobacco field, Im only exaggerating, like, a tiny bit, he said. He is white, but hes from a county that is, like Elizabeth City, majority Black. If youre used to the powers that be either passively ignoring you or actively screwing you over, for generations, its natural to hear about some new nefarious thing theyre up to and think, Same shit, different day, he said. The challenge for us, messaging-wise, is to find a way to tell folks, Youre not wrong, but, also, this one really is different.
This one was Moore v. Harper, a Supreme Court case that was set to be argued in December and resolved by the end of June. In 2021, with Tim Moore as the speaker of the North Carolina House, the majority-Republican legislature drew gerrymandered congressional mapsthat is, even more egregiously gerrymandered than usual. Several voters (one of them named Becky Harper) and a handful of nonprofits (including Common Cause, where Jones works) sued to block the implementation of those maps, and the state Supreme Court ruled in their favor. The U.S. Supreme Court was asked to decide whether the legislatures maps should standand, by extension, whether the state court had the power to review them at all. As with many Supreme Court cases, this is a narrow-sounding question that could have vast consequences. Its hard to overstate how wild it would be if this went the wrong way, Marina Jenkins, the executive director of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, told me.
...Akhil Amar, a law professor at Yale, is one of the most frequently cited legal scholars in the country. When it comes to the Supreme Court, he is an ur-institutionalist who can rhapsodize at length about the courtrooms marble friezes, and who has long counted multiple Justices as personal friends. (A few months ago, on a podcast he hosts, he referred to Samuel Alito as a principled person and one of the smartest lawyers I know.) On the question of I.S.L.T., though, he is uncharacteristically cutting. In a recent debate at the Federalist Society, he conceded that the plain-text position sounded plausible on its face, but he described his own view as clearly the better view for anyone whos gone to law school and who has a brain. Last year, he and his brother Vikram, the dean of the University of Illinois College of Law, published a law-review article called Eradicating Bush-League Arguments Root and Branch, positing that the Framers actually intended for legislature to mean a states entire lawmaking apparatus, including the judicial and executive branches. This kind of thing happens in the Constitution all the time, Vikram told me. (For example, the Constitution says that New States may be admitted by the Congress, but the process has always involved the President, and courts have weighed in, too.) Extreme proponents of I.S.L.T. maintain that the legislatures power over elections is plenaryunconstrained by state courts. But the Amar brothers contend that there is no indication that this power was meant to be so absolute. Thats just not how it works, Vikram said.
No Paywall
https://archive.ph/x7xMM
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1140 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How a Fringe Legal Theory Became a Threat to Democracy (Original Post)
icymist
Jun 2023
OP
rubbersole
(6,660 posts)1. Shouldn't 9 (5 actually) unaccountable appointed individuals...
..tell 350 million citizens how to live? Framers were so quaint...
FBaggins
(26,721 posts)2. Not the best way to frame the debate perhaps...
since the underlying question is whether 5 (3 actually) individuals should tell 11 million individuals how to live. Particularly when they are accountable to the voters and lost their jobs because of the decision.