Alabama IVF Ruling: When The Law Has A Personal Problem
https://www.counterpunch.org/2024/02/26/alabama-ivf-ruling-when-the-law-has-a-personal-problem/Answer: When the Alabama Supreme Court issues its ruling in LePage v. Mobile Infirmary Clinic, Inc., allowing the parents of several such embryos, created through in-vitro fertilization, to proceed with a wrongful death lawsuit after those embryos were accidentally destroyed.
-snip-
What who is a person or child deserving of particular rights and protections?
bucolic_frolic
(43,177 posts)Could be a corporation, or an industry, or cousin Sally Mae. Yet it becomes the law!
LearnedHand
(3,389 posts)I like how the article framed the question, but the author takes the stance that the judges were just following the law. I kept waiting for a rebuttal of their decision or decision process or something, but it never came. And it definitely never tackled "who or what is a person." Then I saw his little bio. Oh, right.
LearnedHand
(3,389 posts)limbicnuminousity
(1,402 posts)And I agree with your assessment of the piece. The strength is in how the author frames the issue and questions. Framing the context of the discussion properly is important, I think, since the theocrats on the Alabama SC are trying to frame it as a religious issue. It's a human rights issue, or, as the author calls it, a political and legal question. Church and state are not two great tastes that go great together.
peace
LearnedHand
(3,389 posts)It infuriates me when Dems respond to Republican atrocities using the Republican framework. And they (Republicans)excel at framing the issues and destroying the Overton Window.