Katie Roiphe: In Defense of Single Motherhood
IN a season of ardent partisan clashing, Americans seem united in at least one shared idea: Single mothers are bad. A Pew Research Center poll on family structures reports that nearly 7 in 10 Americans think single mothers are a bad thing for society.
Conservatives obsess over moral decline, and liberals worry extravagantly and one could argue condescendingly about children, but all exhibit a fundamental lack of imagination about what family can be and perhaps more pressingly what family is: we now live in a country in which 53 percent of the babies born to women under 30 are born to unmarried mothers.
I happen to have two children with two different fathers, neither of whom I live with, and both of whom we are close to. I am lucky enough to be living in financially stable, relatively privileged circumstances, and to have had the education that allows me to do so. I am not the typical single mother, but then there is no typical single mother any more than there is a typical mother. It is, in fact, our fantasies and crude stereotypes of this typical single mother that get in the way of a more rational, open-minded understanding of the variety and richness of different kinds of families.
The structure of my household is messy, bohemian, warm. If there is anything that currently oppresses the children, it is the idea of the way families are supposed to be, an idea pushed in picture books and classrooms and in adults casual conversation on American children at a very early age and with surprising aggressiveness.
(...)
Studies like those done by the Princeton sociologist Sara S. McLanahan, who is one of the foremost authorities on single motherhood and its impact on children, show that conditions like poverty and instability, which frequently accompany single-mother households, increase the chances that the children involved will experience alcoholism, mental illness, academic failure and other troubles. But there is no conclusive evidence that, absent those conditions, the pure, pared-down state of single motherhood is itself dangerous to children.
PROFESSOR McLANAHANS studies over the years, and many others like them, show that the primary risks associated with single motherhood arise from financial insecurity. They also offer evidence that, to a lesser extent, particular romantic patterns of the mother namely introducing lots of boyfriends into childrens lives contribute to the risk. What the studies dont show is that longing for a married father at the breakfast table injures children.
Full: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/12/opinion/sunday/in-defense-of-single-motherhood.html?pagewanted=all
Roiphe is a journalism professor at NYU. However, her past writings have been controversial, as she is a sexual harrassment denialist and date rape victim-blamer, essentially echoing the talking points from those who most aggressively decry single motherhood.
ejpoeta
(8,933 posts)but we were not married. We struggled a lot. But they bitch that they don't want you to have the choice to prevent pregnancies or to terminate them if you end up pregnant. Then they want to demonize the mother. It seems like they just want to have another excuse to demonize women... period.
I know a few single mothers and I am amazed at how well they can keep it together. My one friend has 4 kids. They are generally well mannered kids who are always helpful when they come over.
I think that people have this idea about things and refuse to live in reality. You don't get to dictate everyone else's life. I think part of the problem is that to these folks kids are a punishment. And women are always to blame. Do you think I suddenly became a better parent when my boyfriend and I finally got around to getting married? after 10 years together? After I had had a kid and a miscarriage and another one was about to pop out?
All in all I think it is an attempt to stem the tide. To pretend that ozzie and harriet was real and the reality of things were something else.