Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

midnight

(26,624 posts)
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 11:57 AM Aug 2012

Private Equity, Public Inequity

"Investment bankers and other major financial players are increasingly interested in taking control of water and sewer services across the United States. Private equity vehicles are armed with more than $100 billion for infrastructure worldwide. Although most deals in the U.S. water utility market have involved existing private sector companies, a number of fund managers anticipate that the ongoing fiscal crisis will drive some governments to privatize their water infrastructure. To make that prediction a reality, major financial interests are backing various government proposals that facilitate privatization and private financing of public infrastructure."

"This is an alarming development. Private equity players typically focus on short-term profits and may seek to flip assets after driving down service quality and driving up prices. Households and businesses could end up paying more for inferior service.

Key findings:

There have been only half a dozen sizable private equity takeovers of water and sewer services in the United States, but four new deals were nearing consummation or awaiting regulatory approval in 2012. (See Table 1, page 4.)
Major financial firms are promoting large, complex and risky privatization deals, which essentially act as high- interest credit cards to finance budget shortfalls and infrastructure projects. Cash-strapped governments lack the bargaining power and know-how to properly negotiate these deals.
Private equity players have targeted annual returns of at least 12–15 percent.
Private equity players usually flip assets within a decade.
Private equity takeovers tend to be highly leveraged and risky.
Private equity players are notorious tax avoiders and evaders. In the last five years, for example, the Carlyle Group made more than $4 billion in profit but paid an effective income tax rate of only 2 percent.
Private equity takeovers restrict transparency and accountability.
Read the Full Report"

http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/reports/private-equity-public-inequity/


Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Private Equity, Public In...