W. A. Lawrence: Republicans Will Detonate Their Secret Weapon at the Midnight Hour to Stop Women from Voting
Imagine arriving at your polling place in November only to be turned away because you changed your name when you got married. Youve voted for 20 years with valid identification. Nothing matters. The SAVE Act passed the House in April, and 69 million American women are about to discover their names dont match their birth certificates while the deadline to fix the problem has already closed.
You arrive at your polling place the same as every election since 2004 with the same precinct, same poll workers, and same ritual of civic participation, but this time the worker scans your drivers license, frowns, types into the computer, then looks up with an apologetic expression that will replay in nightmares.
Im sorry, but your documents dont match. Your license says Martinez, but your birth certificate says Chen. I cant give you a ballot.
https://wendy664.substack.com/p/republicans-will-detonate-their-secret
slightlv
(7,498 posts)I've been yelling for years they want to stop women from voting. But to this article, in particular, I wonder... if you've gone through all the hassle, spent all the money, gathered the necessary documents from around the country, and FINALLY made it to your "Real ID"... will that be enough? Or is the REAL ID not going to be "Real" enough for them any longer? Oh... try to stop me from voting. I'll be jailed, no doubt, because of my mouth and my actions. I've voted in every election... city, county, school board, state, and federal since I was 18, even while I was in the Air Force. I WILL bloody scream like murder if they try to stop THIS veteran from exercising her rights!
maptap22
(255 posts)Would this be the thing to finally wake R woman up to the fact that they think we are second class citizens?
Skittles
(169,888 posts)nothing says inequality like giving up your identity
LymphocyteLover
(9,467 posts)FakeNoose
(40,416 posts)I don't believe this scenario would ever really happen, and the Repukes would be stupid to try it. They would lose a good portion of their own voters by doing this.
Aren't liberal/Dem/blue voters more likely to be using their own birthnames, while R women are more likely to have changed to their husband's name?
nilram
(3,489 posts)LymphocyteLover
(9,467 posts)SunSeeker
(57,707 posts)Where Republicans are trying to make it even more draconian.
https://www.newsweek.com/republican-reveals-plans-change-save-act-requirements-11384723
Baitball Blogger
(51,809 posts)Have a certificate to prove it?