(CNN) Fact check: Trump's WSJ op-ed was littered with false and misleading claims
Source: CNN
Fact check: Trumps WSJ op-ed was littered with false and misleading claims
6 hr ago
PUBLISHED Feb 3, 2026, 2:51 PM ET
By Daniel Dale, Alicia Wallace, Tami Luhby
The Wall Street Journal published an op-ed on Friday under the name of President Donald Trump. Trump criticized experts who warned that his tariff policies would cause economic destruction, writing that the spectacular economic numbers coming out every single day are proof that he was right and they were wrong.
But Trumps rosy case was based in part on figures that are plain false or highly misleading, using cherry-picked beginning and ending points for various calculations to serve the presidents argument. And some of his qualitative claims were also inaccurate.
Here is a fact check.
Investment in the US
Trump repeated his regular false claim that in less than one year back in office, we have secured commitments for more than $18 trillion in new investment in the US, a number that is unfathomable to many. The number is not only unfathomable but factually incorrect. As of Tuesday, four days after the op-ed came out, the White Houses own website said the figure for major investment announcements during this Trump term was $9.6 trillion, and even that is a major exaggeration; a detailed CNN review in October found the White House was counting trillions of dollars in vague investment pledges, pledges that were about bilateral trade or economic exchange rather than investment in the US, and vague statements that didnt even rise to the level of pledges.
-snip-
Read more: https://edition.cnn.com/2026/02/03/politics/fact-check-trump-wsj-op-ed
RandySF
(82,074 posts)underpants
(195,516 posts)Actual picture. Sharpie.

This was an EXCELLENT article.
WTF *IS* that???
underpants
(195,516 posts)Did Trump Write His Speech at a Receptionists Desk?
January 18, 2017
As tends to be the case with the president-elects social-media statements, there is much to discuss. First, theres the fact that Trump seems to be drafting his first speech as POTUS with a
Sharpie. And second, perhaps more important, theres the question of Trumps desk, which
appears to be one usually occupied by an administrative or hospitality professional a receptionist or concierge, maybe in a public hall at Mar-a-Lago, and not in a private office.
So were not saying that Trump didnt write his speech, in Sharpie, on a legal pad, at this desk, with its magnificent and inspirational eagle statue. Obviously he did; why would the president-elect stage such a photograph?
https://politicalwire.com/2017/01/18/trump-write-speech-receptionists-desk/
Skittles
(170,171 posts)I'm surprised CNN is doing this, like other mainstream media they seem to play Trump toadies way too often - maybe they've had enough? And FUCK the WSJ, fucking Murdoch assholes.
Turbineguy
(39,907 posts)them's his specialty