Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Uncle Joe

(64,606 posts)
Thu Feb 12, 2026, 02:12 PM 11 hrs ago

Nancy Mace on unredacted names in Epstein files: 'You would be shocked'

(snip)

“You would be shocked, Piers, at some of the names that I have seen that came across the DOJ in emails that the DOJ is protecting,” Mace said during a Wednesday appearance on “Piers Morgan Uncensored.”

“And we’re talking about people on both sides of the aisle. We’re talking about famous people, rich people, people in power, prime ministers, former prime ministers, former presidents, et cetera, media personalities that are named in these files,” she added.

(snip)

“Terrifying language in the Epstein Files I viewed yesterday,” Boebert wrote in a Wednesday post on X.

“-Emails about torture -Frequent talk of ‘consumption’? -A restaurant called ‘The Cannibal’ The women around Epstein were also deeply involved in trafficking children. These are sick, sick people.”

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5735449-mace-shocked-epstein-files-names/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nancy Mace on unredacted names in Epstein files: 'You would be shocked' (Original Post) Uncle Joe 11 hrs ago OP
You've finally found... 2naSalit 10 hrs ago #1
So let's hear them. As Ace Frehley said, "Shock me!" kysrsoze 9 hrs ago #2
I'm glad this is coming out. progressoid 9 hrs ago #3
What I read was that Merrick Garland was still investigating, which is why we didn't hear this earlier. ificandream 8 hrs ago #4

progressoid

(52,841 posts)
3. I'm glad this is coming out.
Thu Feb 12, 2026, 04:08 PM
9 hrs ago

But disappointed (understatement of the day) that it didn't come our earlier. Would we have Trump 2.0 if these documents had been released 2 years ago?

I don't have a lot of trust in the general electorate to do the right thing. Considering how they ignored so many Trump crimes in the past, but maybe this would have made a difference?...I dunno...maybe....

And a part of me thinks that we (Democrats, the previous DOJ etc) fucked up by leaving this on the back burner. If this had blown up during the election....

ificandream

(11,782 posts)
4. What I read was that Merrick Garland was still investigating, which is why we didn't hear this earlier.
Thu Feb 12, 2026, 04:53 PM
8 hrs ago

Could the Biden admin. have made an issue out of this? I don't know, to be honest. I hope not. Bondi was sure happy enough to blame it, though.

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Nancy Mace on unredacted ...