The Shooting Death of Rene Good: The Investigation that Wasn't Allowed to Happen
The investigation began the way accountability is designed to work—and then it was halted.
In the hours after Renée Good was shot inside her S.U.V. on a Minneapolis street, the case moved where such deaths usually go. A senior federal prosecutor sought a warrant. Investigators prepared to document blood spatter and bullet trajectories. The work was procedural, unglamorous, and—by the standards of American law enforcement—routine. Then the work stopped.
What halted it was not a judge’s ruling or a missing fact, but an instruction from Washington. Federal agents who were ready to execute a signed warrant were told to stand down. According to people familiar with the episode, the concern was not uncertainty about what the evidence might show, but anxiety that the investigation itself would contradict the President’s public account of what had already happened.
In American civic life, this is a small moment with a long shadow. It marks the point at which a process designed to discover facts was asked to conform to a narrative already declared. The details of the Good shooting remain contested. The mechanics of the investigation that followed—or did not—are not. Together they illustrate how accountability can be rerouted without changing the law, simply by changing the order in which institutions are allowed to act.
https://www.lincolnsquare.media/p/the-shooting-death-of-renee-good